
Observing
with the QUCAM2 L3 camera
Observers should be aware
of important differences between these cameras and other conventional
cameras that they may have used at ING.
New Command Syntax
In
addition to all the usual uDAS commands , we have introduced some new
ones to allow better performance in the application of rapid
spectroscopy. Previously uDAS has suffered from very bad timing jitter
when taking sequences of rapid spectra. We have now offloaded the
timing task from the SPARC into the SDSU controller where the
timing is now locked to a crystal oscillator. These new commands
supersede the earlier 'rsrun' command.
The new commands (currently available only on the QUCAMs) are as follow:
rmode spec <n_reads>
rmode simple
run, glance, scratch etc.
To enable the rapid spectroscopy readout mode for the camera, the
command 'rmode spec <n_reads>' is used. For example to set the
camera up to perform 360 readouts:
rmode qucam2
spec 360
Once the readout mode is set, the normal run commands (run, glance,
scratch etc.) are used to perform exposures. The time specified in the
run command is then used as the integration time for each readout in
the readout sequence e.g.
run qucam2 5
- perform a sequence of 5 second exposures, with the number of
exposures determined by the n_reads parameter used in the '
rmode spec
<n_reads>' command.
The time taken to perform a rapid spectroscopy run will be
approximately:
t = n_reads * (exposure_time + readout_time)
To disable the rapid spectroscopy readout mode for the camera, set the
readout mode back to simple:
rmode qucam2
simple
Image sequences obtained using '
rmode spec' are stored in a single fits
file with extensions.
NOTE: zero second exposures are not permitted. 1ms is the minimum
requested exposure time.
Calculating Exposure Times
Exposures
for the L3 cameras are timed using the processor clock of the SDSU
controller. the crystal clock is specced to 100ppm across its whole
temperature range. Since the temperature of the controller is pretty
stable, the actual timing accuracy will be a lot better than this.
When doing 'rmode simple' exposures there will be a timing
error
(probably at the level of 10s of ms) associated with the opening
and
closing of the mechanical shutter and this will dominate. When doing
image sequences using the 'rmode spec' command timing will be much
better.
There is an important feature of frame transfer operation that the
observer should be aware of. When using the 'rmode spec' command to do
a sequence of spectra. If for example we request the following:
rmode spec 100
run 0.1
we will not
get 100 frames with an exposure time of 0.1seconds. The exposure time
will in fact be 0.1s + the time it takes for a frame to read out.
During a frame transfer sequence there are no clears between
frames so
the exposure time = cycle time of system. The QUCAM2 web page indicates
that a 100 high window will take 600ms in fast speed. The above command
would then in fact generate 100 frames with an exposure time of
0.1+0.6=0.7 seconds. It is the demanded rather than actual exposure
time that will appear in the EXPTIME field of the image header. The
true exposure time can be calculated from the UTSTART fields of 2
consecutive frames.
Timing Jitter in Image Sequences
When
using the 'rmode spec' command the image sequences will have an
extremely low timing jitter. The timing of each frame is locked to a
crystal oscillator in the SDSU controller. The crystal stability is
100ppm across it full temperature range. The true stability in
the more stable interior of the controller will be at least an order of
magnitude better than
this (untested). This would
therefore correspond to a timing
drift of 18ms per half hour exposure. This is tiny compared to
the minimum exposure time of the system (hundreds of ms).
Latency between image sequences
As
each image sequence run progresses, the pixel data is stored in a raw
format in a buffer. At the end of the run this data is then assembled
into a multi-extension fits file and written to the obsdata disc. This
takes 50s for a 388MB image sequence. During the first 16s of this
period the DAS is processing the image and a new run cannot be started.
After 16s the observer can commence a new run.
Data Volume
If
image sequences with minimum exposure time of 1ms are taken, the data
rate will be 592KByte per second or approximately 1GByte per 30 minute
observation. Runs of greater than 30 minutes or with data volumes
greater than 500MB are not recommended.
Time Stamps
A
time stamp is obtained from the ING timeserver at the start and end of
each 'rmode spec' sequence. A timestamp is then calculated by
interpolation for each of the frames in the sequence and inserted into
each frame's header in the 'UTSTART' field. The absolute accuracy of
this timestamp is 1ms.
A link to the ING timeserver webpage can be found here
An example header can be found here
Amplifier Selection
The L3 CCDs have 2 amplifiers. One is a conventional low noise
amplifier with very similar characteristics to the EEV and RED+
cameras. This conventional amplifier can be selected by using the
'rspeed slow' command prior to doing a run. This amplifier is preferred
if the observations are to be photon noise rather than detector noise
limited. The second amplifier uses avalanche multiplication in an 'L3
register' to give read noise of <<1e. It can be selected by using
the 'rspeed fast' command prior to doing a run. It is preferred for
observations that would otherwise be detector noise limited. The noise
of this amplifier is sufficiently low to easily allow the detection of
single photons and as the object brightness falls , the image can
be seen to break up into discrete spots, each corresponding to a single
photo-electron.
Since the readout amplifiers are positioned on opposite sides of the
CCD, when switching between amplifiers the observer will notice that
the images become mirrored. This effect is shown in the two spectra
below. These were obtained on ISIS Blue arm with QUCAM2

5 second exposure. L3 amplifier selected

60 second exposure. Normal amplifier
selected
Frame Transfer Operation
In addition to having L3 architecture, the QUCAMs also have a frame
transfer geometry. If the observer is doing 'rmode simple'
exposures then they will notice no difference compared to a normal CCD
readout ; the exposure will be mechanically shuttered just like a
normal science camera. For image sequences
taken with the 'rmode spec' command, however, the FT operation is fully
utilised. The mechanical shutter is only operated at the very start and
end of the sequence. The exposure time of the individual frames is then
defined by the frame transfer operation where the image are is rapidly
shifted under a light tight store area from where it is more leisurely
read out whilst the next frame is exposing. The CCD is therefore
exposing almost continuously and makes maximum use of the light
delivered by the telescope. With very bright sources and very
short exposure times , vertical streaks above and below the
highlights may become visible in the
image. These are artifacts of the frame transfer process. Frame
transfer takes 15ms.
Windowing
Windowing in X is not recommended since it will reduce the gain of the
system. Windowing in Y has no such effect. This is unlikely to be a
limitation since in the case of QUCAM2 the spectral axis is horizontal
and already has a fairly limited extent due to the small CCD size.
Windowing in Y will be useful for reducing data volume and increasing
readout speed. It will have no effect on the noise,CIC or gain.
Binning
Only Y binning has been implemented . On-chip binning is not generally
recommended for L3 observations except to reduce read out times.
In a conventional CCD , binning offers a noiseless method of adding
pixels. Since the read noise of an L3 chip is close to zero , any
binning can be accomplished post-readout with very little penalty.
Post-readout binning can then be done in a flexible manner.
Aborting
An abort in mid run will take no longer than the frame cycle time +
12s to return the observing system prompt.
Clock Induced Charge
Some stray charge is generated inside the CCD by the clock transitions.
All CCDs display this but it is generally swamped by the read noise. In
L3 CCDs the CIC is clearly visible as a random sprinkling of single
photo-electron events. The effect is very like that of a faint
background. CIC is independent of exposure time. QUCAM2 has a CIC of
about 0.035 electrons per pixel, meaning that about 1 in 30 pixels will
contain an electron of CIC.
Multiplication Noise
This is an additional noise source introduced by the L3 multiplication
process. It acts to amplify the Poissonian photon noise by a factor of
root(2). In the photon noise limited regime this can be equated with an
effective 50% loss in quantum efficiency. Multiplication noise means
that a single electron entering the multiplication register can give a
whole range of possible output values. The graph below shows a
histogram of pixel values found in a very weakly iluminated flat field
(the mean illumination being <<1 photon per pixel).
What the graph shows is that a single electron can generate a signal of
anywhere between 1 and >1000 ADU of output. Incidentally, the
gradient of the linear portion of this histogram can be used to
calculate the gain of the system. The gradient = -1 x system gain in
units of input electrons per output ADU. Note the log base e vertical
scale.
Charge Transfer Efficiency
Cosmic rays typically leave a large horizontal trail in the image
indicative of poor horizontal charge transfer efficiency. This is due
to the charge carrying capacity of the L3 register being exceeded
during the multiplication process. At lower signal levels, for which
these cameras are optimised, poor CTE is not a problem. This was tested
using a laboratory pinhole focussed into a spot with a FWHM of
<2pixels. The peak amplitude of the spot was approximately 300
electrons i.e. approaching the top of the dynamic range of the camera
when in L3 mode. The spot image was examined for elongation when read
out through both the conventional and L3 amplifiers. The image was then
analysed using a 2D Gaussian fitting program to measure the FWHM in
both axes.

|

|
Normal
Amplifier
|
L3 Amplifier
|
As can be seen by eye the images do not display any horizontal
trailing. The Gaussian fitting program gave the following results:
L3 Amplifier. Spot FWHM = 1.93
in X , 1.85 in Y
Normal Amplifier.
Spot FWHM = 1.91 in X , 1.94 in Y
Gain Stability
The conventional
amplifier should have a very stable gain close to 0.97e/adu. There will
only be a very weak temperature dependence and ageing effect. The L3
amplifier on the other hand has a very high temperature coefficient of
about -4% per degree K. When the camera is still in the process of
cooling down the gain will be considerably lower than that stated on
the web page. Gain calibration frames should be taken at intervals
throughout an observing run. These can be stacks of bias frames that
can be later analysed using the histogram method described above.
Alternatively if the science frames contain generous un-illuminated
areas, these will contain enough CIC events to allow each individual
frame to be used for gain calibration. An alternative method for
monitoring L3 gain changes is to observe a stable source (for example a
calibration lamp) through the conventional amplifier before swapping
back to the L3 amplifier. The conventional amplifier is known to be
very stable and can be used to calculate accurately the source
brightness. The gain stability has been tested in the laboratory using
a stable pinhole source. It's image was defocussed so as to allow a
brighter source to be used without saturating the CCD. The graph below
shows the integrated brightness of the pinhole image during two
consecutive 30minute 'rmode spec' runs. Each run consisted of 360
5second exposures. It demonstrates gain stability as well as the
absence of timing glitches in the cadence of the exposures.

The first frame in each run appeared to have an exposure of about 6%
less than the rest of the run. The observed brightness of the source
(discounting these initial frames) during the full 1 hour observation
had a standard deviation of 0.5%
Photon Counting
If
the images are not too deeply exposed (<0.1 photo-electrons per
pixel on average) then it is possible to do photon counting. A
threshold is applied to the images and any pixels over that limit are
interpreted as containing 1 photon. This has the benefit of removing
multiplication noise. Some care must be exercised in the choice of
threshold. If too high then the effective QE will suffer as some
photo-electron events will fall under the bar. If set too low, then
read noise will cause false triggers. The read noise is about 3-4ADU ,
the average height of a photo-electron is about 116 ADU. Setting the
threshold to about 20 ADU (above bias mean) would be a good
starting point. In the case of a spectra containing both strong and
faint emission lines it should even be possible to apply photon
counting analysis to the faint line and proportional analysis to the
stronger.
Pros and cons of using the L3 amplifier
The ability to do temporal, spectral and spatial binning post-readout
is a great advantage in an L3 CCD. These can all be accomplished with
minimal noise penalty. Generally speaking any application that would
otherwise be readnoise limited is best done with an L3 detector. One
obvious application would be the detection of very faint emission
lines. If the application is photon noise limited then it will
generally be better to use a conventional detector since it does not
suffer from multiplication noise. The nice thing about the QUCAMs is
that they have the flexibility to be used in both conventional and L3
mode depending on which speed is selected..
Links
Quick Look Data Reduction Software for
QUCAM2
Monte Carlo
Modeling of L3 detectors in High Time Resolution Applications, HTRA
Edinburgh Sep 2007 (pdf)
Photon
Counting and Fast Photometry with L3 CCDs. SPIE5492-173 Glasgow 2004,
Simon Tulloch (pdf)
Photon
Counting Stategies with L3 CCDs , A.Basden
Sub
Electron noise at MHz pixel rates, Craig Mackay, SPIE 43061 (pdf)
Powerpoint
presentation on L3 detectors (includes section on Deep Depletion
CCDs also)
Simon Tulloch Jan 2008