Baseline Wavefront Sensor Work Package Description
wht-naomi-57
Document Number AOW/SUB/RAH/6.6/03/97.
Version date
26/03/97
1.0 Introduction and General Requirements 2
1.1 Introduction 2
1.2 Overall Size, Opto-Mechanical Interfaces and Configuration 3
1.3 Main WFS Assembly 4
1.4 Measurement Accuracy and Range 6
1.5 Reliability 6
1.6 Health and Safety 6
2.0 Optical Design 6
2.1 General Requirements 6
2.2 Lenslet Arrays and Relay Optics 7
2.3 Spectral and Neutral density Filters 8
2.4 Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector 8
2.5 Shutter 9
2.6 Optics for Calibration and Alignment 9
2.7 Upgrade to Turbulent-Layer Conjugation 9
3.0 CCD Camera and Controller 10
4.0 Wavefront Processor (Note: The wavefront processor will be part of RTCS and thus this section is included primarily for information purposes .) 10
5.0 Calibration and Alignment 10
5.1 Calibration 10
5.2 Alignment 11
6.0 Independent Control Module
7.0 Environmental Requirements
7.1 General Requirements 12
7.2 Vibration and Stability 13
7.3 Cleaning Procedures 13
8.0 Error Budgets 14
9.0 Additional Support and Interface Requirements 15
10.0 Reviews and Procedures 16
11.0 Deliverable Items 16
This document should be read in conjunction with the
AOW/GEN/AJL/6.8/07/96 WP Cover Document which references several other relevant
documents and the AOW/SYS/RMM/6.2/01/97/NAOMI S & O Requirements document.
Together these documents constitute the current requirements for NAOMI (Nasmyth
AO system for Multiple-Purpose Instrumentation). (These documents are from time
to time updated by their authors; readers can ensure they have the latest
versions by checking with the Project Manager.)
The wavefront sensor shall be based on the Shack-Hartmann
configuration. In this configuration the input pupil is divided into several
square subapertures by an array of small lenses; the number of subapertures is
determined primarily by the atmospheric turbulence conditions and the
compensation wavelength of the adaptive optics system. Each lens focuses the
light from a guide star on a section of a detector array, e.g. 4 x 4 pixels,
and the position of the focused spot’s
centroid is measured. The average phase gradient for each subaperture (when
expressed in radians/subaperture) is
determined by dividing the centroid shift of the focused spot by the effective
focal length of the lens. Corrections are usually applied for wedge effects in
the lens arrays and spatial non-uniformities in the detector-array characteristics. Because the Shack-Hartmann sensor
does not provide a direct phase measurement
of the turbulence-degraded wavefront, the phase gradients are
transmitted to a reconstructor which calculates the phase.
For many adaptive optics applications the subaperture
size is sufficiently small that tilt is
the only significant wavefront aberration present and thus each focused spot on the detector array is
essentially diffraction limited. This will not be the case for all operating
conditions of NAOMI. For this system the phase gradient will be measured in the 0.4 µm to a maximum of
1.0 µm spectral region whereas the
compensation will be applied at longer wavelengths, generally from 1 µm to 2.2
µm. Although the higher-order
aberrations over each subaperture may be small at the compensation wavelength,
this is not necessarily so at the measurement wavelengths. Thus the wavefront
sensor design must be designed to handle focused spot sizes and centroid motions that vary with the
atmospheric turbulence conditions.
Subject to the results of the UK Joint Observatories
Site Evaluation (JOSE) programme, the sensor
should operate under conditions
where the atmospheric coherence length, ro , at a
wavelength of 0.55 µm is greater than 8 cm. Provisions to accommodate this
range of conditions are discussed later.
The wavefront sensor shall normally operate with a
lenslet array providing 7.35 subapertures across the telescope pupil diameter;
the subaperture width as projected at the WHT aperture is 57.1 cm. The
capability to operate occasionally with a
nominal 3.68 subapertures per pupil diameter is also required; the WFS
supplier should determine the optimum configuration (see Section 2.2). A Fried
geometry is required, i.e. the ELECTRA deformable-mirror segments must map
exactly on to the WFS subapertures. Note that lenslet arrays will be larger
than 7.35 x 7.35 and the nominal 3.68 x 3.68 subapertures respectively to
accommodate an upgrade to a turbulent-layer conjugation capability.
Turbulent-layer conjugation is not a function of the baseline design. Further
information on the lenslet array formats is given in Section 2.2. The sensor’s
lenslet array will focus the guide star
radiation from each subaperture on a high-performance, low-noise CCD.
The CCD camera
and its controller will either be supplied by the UK adaptive optics project or
they will approve the choice. If the choice of a camera cannot be made readily
then two WFS camera designs may be carried through to the PDR. The CCD should
have 80 x 80 pixels for flexibility when imaging a dominant turbulent layer as
part of the AO system upgrade. Although the CCD will provide a maximum of 8 x 8
pixels for use by each Hartmann spot, this pixel configuration may seldom be
used except for acquisition purposes or in
a spot-tracking mode if a very low noise CCD is available. Baseline
operation will use 4 x 4 pixels
(unbinned with a guard “ring”). The use of 6 x 6 pixels is anticipated for
acquisition purposes in moderate to strong turbulence. The capability to change
the pixel configuration, e.g., from 4 x4 to a quad cell, without losing lock is
required. For preliminary design purposes the CCD pixels may be assumed to be
24 µm square unless the WFS supplier already has selected a specific CCD
configuration.
A high performance 4-port CCD with low readout noise
and high quantum efficiency is required. The serial data stream of pixel
intensities from the CCD camera head will be fed to a wavefront processor which
from a functional viewpoint may be regarded as an integral part of the
wavefront sensor. The wavefront processor will be provided by the project as
part of another work package. The main functions of this processor are
to correct the raw intensity data, e.g. for spatial variations in the CCD response, and to calculate the
phase gradients. The latter are then
sent to the wavefront reconstructor which calculates the wavefront phase. The
processor also calculates the intensity at each subaperture; these data are
sent to a real-time display and a recording system. The reconstructor, display
and recording systems are covered by other specifications. The processed
wavefront data will be used to perform at least the three functions below;
these functions are described primarily for information purposes.
1. Tip-tilt data will be sent to the fast steering
mirror except for DC and large, low-bandwidth tilts which will be unloaded to
the WHT control system (See Baseline Optical Chassis WPD AOW/SUB/5.0/07/96 for
further information).
2. Higher-order wavefront data will be used to control
the system’s deformable mirror except for telescope focus errors as noted in
the third function.
3. Focus error will be offloadable to the telescope to
keep the telescope wavefront focus peak-to-valley error < 0.2 µm.
The sensor design will also incorporate equipment for
calibration and alignment as specified in Section 5.0.
The WFS pick-off design will maintain the guide star
on the WFS optical axis regardless of its position within the field of the
telescope. The WFS pick-off must allow the acquisition of a guide star anywhere
within the unvignetted Nasmyth field.When needed it must also support dithering
using the selected guide star.
The following description gives a pick-off
specification which is couched mostly in terms of a preferred implementation.
Note that the pick-off specifications are intended to apply to the
positioning of the WFS as a complete assembly
and thus the WFS design should not compromise the required pick-off performance
in any way. Minor changes to described implementation concept are allowed
provided they do not affect the overall operational concept. The NAOMI system
engineer should be informed of any proposed changes.
The guide-star
pick-off will be mounted on a remotely controlled 2-axis stage with motion in
the x and y axes. The stage axes are defined relative to the corrected f/16.8
focal plane with the y-axis in a vertical plane. Motion in the x-y plane allows the guide star to be selected by
translating the pick-off mirror(s) and its mounting plate(s) to the designated
field point. This motion also allows the dithering mode to be supported. Table
1 gives the pickoff specifications for the x and y axes. All ranges are minimum
values and they do not allow for alignment errors or the need to accommodate
the WFS calibration source; consideration must be given to providing additional
range as appropriate. Two dithering ranges with different repeatabilities are
required by Clause 4 and these are addressed in Table 1.
Table
1. Specifications for x and y axes of the WFS pick-off.
FUNCTION |
REQUIREMENT |
Acquisition |
Range: ± 32.5 mm |
|
Step size: £ 7 µm |
|
Accuracy: £ 3.4 µm |
|
Maximum Speed: ³ 1.9 mm/second |
Dithering |
Repeatability: |
|
a) ± 3.4 µm (± 0.01 arcsecond) or better for a total
dithering range of 1.7 mm (5
arcsecond) |
|
b) ± 8.5 µm (± 0.025 arcsecond) or better for a
total dithering range of 6 mm (18 arcsecond) |
|
Amplitude accuracy: ± 17 µm (± 0.05 arcsecond) or
better |
The specifications given in Table 1 apply to sidereal
objects. As a design goal the WFS should be able to operate with non-sidereal
objects, e.g. Jupiter’s satellites or asteroids.
When using a non-sidereal object for wavefront sensing
and observing a different non-sidereal science object, the maximum differential
rate for the x and y axes shall be 2.3 µm/sec (0.007 arcsec/sec); a typical
rate may be about 0.8 µm/sec (0.0023
arcsec/sec). When observing sidereal
science objects and performing wavefront sensing with a non-sidereal object,
the maximum rate shall be 13 µm/sec (0.04 arcsec/sec); a typical rate may be
4.5 µm/sec (0.013 arcsec/sec). In both modes an accuracy of ± 0.02 arcsecond or
better shall be a design goal. The tracking accuracy should be maintained over at least a 5-minute period with a goal
of > 10 minutes. If multiple exposures are required, e.g. several 5-minute
exposures, then the pick-off position shall be reset at the end of each
exposure to remove any cumulative offset. Repositioning to within 0.01
arcsecond is required. Any effort expended in meeting or attempting to meet
these goals should they prove very difficult must not significantly increase
costs. If such a problem is anticipated an alternative approach may be
considered that, although not complying completely with these specifications,
still provides a potentially useful capability. Approval must be received from
the project before alternatives are implemented.
The z axis is defined as the optical axis and for the
WFS it will be folded in a horizontal plane at 90 degrees to the optical axis
of the second off-axis paraboloid. The Main WFS assembly will be divided into
two modules mounted on a common slide (or rails) but with independent position
control. The slide will define the direction of travel for the z axis. One
module will consist of a collimating lens, an atmospheric dispersion corrector
(ADC), spectral and neutral density filters, and lenslet arrays. The other will
support a relay lens, shutter, the WFS camera and probably the controller. When
changing lenslets the latter unit will be moved to the image focus of the
selected lenslet array. When moving the pickoff to different field positions
the two modules will move together to maintain focus. Note that the removal of
field curvature will be accomplished in this manner. The range of motion should
be sufficient to cover at least the field curvature over the entire field,
together with any initial positioning error, but need not handle the large
focal shift (about 53 mm) associated with laser guide stars (system upgrade).
The positional accuracy of the two WFS movable modules shall be such that each
module remains within the depth of focus and the performance specifications are
satisfied. The maximum z-axis speed shall be : ³ 1.9
mm/second.
An EPICS interface shall be provided for all three
axes. The software latency shall be less than 100 µsec to provide good
performance under dynamic conditions. Further information on electrical interfaces and software
requirements will provided in the Interface Control Documents and Software
Requirements Document when available.
Figure 1 shows
the two-dimensional space allocation for the WFS . Note that for the laser
upgrade the WFS specified in this work package description may be used as a
tip/tilt sensor and, if so, a new WFS would then be constructed for use with
laser guide stars (LGS). Thus Figure 1 also shows space for the LGS WFS
upgrade.Figure 1 is also available as an AutoCAD file from Colin Dickson and in
the Drawings area of the NAOMI BSCW facility. at ROE. The drawing number is
00A03L and the last revision is dated
19 December 1996. Detailed dimensions are contained in this file and the file
shall be treated as part of the WPD. Note that the close proximity of the WFS
calibration source to the field-lens/dichroic will require an additional
drawing(s) to define the interface in this area. This drawing, which should be
prepared by RGO in collaboration with ROE, will be referenced when
available. The equipment height should
not extend more than 1 metre above the table surface. The AO-system optical
axis will lie at 150 mm above the table surface.
Figure
1. Space allocations on GHRIL table .
Although the
tip/tilt sensor (TTS) is planned
as part of the system upgrade for
laser-guide-star operation, there is a remote possibility that a TTS may also be required in the near
term system. The WFS supplier should ascertain that a simple TTS such as fibre-coupled APDs in a quad-cell
configuration could be incorporated in the NAOMI optical train, e.g. at the
optical science port. Any anticipated performance limitations, e.g. using only
separate guide stars for tracking and higher-order wavefront sensing, should be
stated. Significant effort should not
be expended on this task. The intent of these specifications is only to
establish feasibility and these specifications should not be interpreted as a
requirement for a TTS.
Note that to keep the weight of the moving assemblies
to a minimum, some components, e.g. power supplies, need not be mounted on the
moving assembly. Any proposal to mount such components elsewhere requires
approval by the project.
.
The WFS module will register against the adjacent
optical-chassis module. The registration repeatability should be < 50 µm in
all three axes. The design of this interface should be the result of
collaboration between the optical-chassis and WFS suppliers. The project
expects that the initial global alignment of the WFS to the optical chassis
will be done with mechanical spacers and/or shims.
The WFS assembly shall have the capability to pivot in
azimuth and elevation about the axial f/16.8 focus for the initial angular
alignment to the optical chassis. The adjustment range and accuracy shall be
determined by the WFS supplier. The adjustment mechanism must allow continous
viewing of the illuminated pupil relative to the pupil fiducial mask described
later in Section 5.2.1. A functionally equivalent approach is acceptable
provided it does not violate the preceding condition.
The main WFS assembly includes the components from the pick-off optics
to the CCD, all mounts and adjustment mechanisms for these components, covers
and baffles. Components beyond the pick-off optics include a collimating lens,
interchangeable spectral and neutral-density filters, an atmospheric dispersion
corrector (ADC), a shutter, interchangeable lenslet arrays, and a relay (or
transfer) lens. The mounting plate or
optical bench to support the components listed above is the responsibility of
the WFS supplier. Note that this description of the main WFS assembly is
intended as a guide and it is not necessarily
complete.
The phase-gradient measurement accuracy along any
axis shall be equal to or better than
0.018 lc rms (where lc = 2.2 µm )
over each subaperture when operating with £ 1500 photons per subaperture per measurement
incident upon the CCD when using no more than 4 x 4 pixels/subaperture. This
specification includes the effects of
sensor noise, photon noise and other sources of error.
At low light level with reduced sensor noise, i.e.,
the conditions for Clause 2, the
measurement accuracy shall be equal to or better than 0.14 lc rms (where lc = 2.2 µm )
over each subaperture when operating with
£ 40 photons
per subaperture per measurement incident upon the CCD when used in a quad-cell
mode. These measurement accuracy specifications apply to a visible atmospheric
coherence length of 20 cm.
Under worst-case conditions (visible ro
of 8 cm) the phase gradient measurement range shall be at least ± 1.5
waves/subaperture (2.2-µm wavelength) when operating in a 4 x 4 pixel mode.
This range assumes Kolmogorov turbulence characteristics and it includes the
effects of the specified AO-system wavefront errors, residual tilt but not the
contributions from the WHT optics (presently unknown). For operation under
favourable conditions (visible ro ³ 13 cm) a range of at least ±
1.5 waves/subaperture over 8 x 8 pixels is acceptable.
The capability to operate over the required range of
atmospheric turbulence shall be demonstrated in the laboratory with simulated
turbulence; the use of phase screens is acceptable for this purpose. The test
shall demonstrate that the wavefront sensor can cover the required range
without significant spill-over of the focused spots into regions of the CCD
used by other subapertures.
Clause 16 requires that the WFS camera shall have an
operational lifetime of > 10,000 hours. All other components shall exceed
this lifetime requirement. As required by Clause 19, where appropriate the same
type of electronic components should be used as are already in use at the ING.
Where other components are used a minimum of one spare for each type shall be
supplied. Any exceptions shall be subject to a specific agreement with ING.
Potential safety hazards shall be identified and measures taken to
protect personnel, e.g. warning notices, covers with interlocks. Handling
procedures and lifting aids, e.g. eye bolts, shall be provided for heavy items.
The input to the WFS will be the image of a guide star
located at the corrected f/16.8 focus. A field stop compatible with the
sensor’s maximum acquisition range is required; the pick-off mirror may serve
as the field stop provided suitable measures are taken to minimise dust
problems (see Section 1.2.4 of the ING Instrument Design Specifications,
Version 1.0, 27th February 1997).
The pick-off optics direct the guide-star light to the
WFS. The pick-off optics are expected to consist of a plane, parallel-sided
glass plate with a small mirror or prism mounted on one optical surface which
directs the guide-star light into the WFS. The plate’s optical surfaces will be
perpendicular to the optical axis at the corrected f/16.8 focus. The mirror or
prism may be moved anywhere within the field to pick off the guide star light.
Mounting approaches other than a parallel-sided glass plate require project
approval. The obscuration of the optical science port’s field of view by the
pick-off optics shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of 5 x 5 arcsecond2. As the space in
the vicinity of the pickoff is severely restricted, the OMC supplier and the
project engineer must be kept informed of any proposed changes to the pick-off design.
The light from the guide star is collimated by the WFS
collimating lens and passes through a
selected filter (see Section 2.3) before reaching a lenslet array. The axial
position of this array will be coincident with an image of the deformable
mirror. A relay (or transfer) lens will
produce a demagnified image of the lenslet’s Hartmann spots at the CCD. The
demagnification will be chosen to place each spot ideally at the centre of each
pixel array for an on-axis input point source. The optical system aberrations
shall not displace any spot from an evenly spaced array by more than 20% of the CCD pixel size. Note
that the allotment to the WFS optics alone will be determined when analysis of
the system optical design is complete. Determination of this allotment will be
the responsibility of the optical chassis supplier; the allotment will be subject
to project review and approval. The relay lens
and CCD will also have sufficient axial travel to allow the lenslet
array to be imaged at the CCD for alignment purposes. An atmospheric dispersion
corrector (ADC) is also required . Specifications for this component are given
in Section 2.4.
The wavefront sensor shall operate over the 0.4 µm to
1.0 µm spectral region. Note that the 0.4 µm - 0.5 µm wavelength range need not
be considered in any calculations involving optimisation of WFS design except as a discriminator between
two otherwise equal options. Transmission and scattering losses into the
optical train shall be kept to a minimum by following good optical design
practices including the use of high efficiency coatings and low scatter
surfaces. The WFS transmission shall be
³ 90 per cent averaged over the 0.5 µm to 1.0 µm
spectral region.
The design should follow general good optical practice
in the elimination of ghosting effects and a first order estimate of the
effects of ghosting within the system to be delivered should be given. This
should be done in collaboration within the optical-chassis work package.
Optics needed for calibration purposes are discussed in Section 5.1.
Three lenslet arrays and associated relay (or
transfer) lens(es) shall be provided to image the Hartmann spots on the CCD.
The lenslet arrays shall be
interchangeable under remote control in less than 5 minutes; this
requirement includes any time needed for realignment and recalibration. Any
lens adjacent to the CCD shall have a minimum back focal length of 10 mm to
provide sufficient clearance from the CCD window. Note that this specification
is being revisited at the request of RGO and, if necessary, it will be changed as soon as possible. A pupil
fiducial mask is also required (see Section 5.2.1) in the lenslet holder as an
alignment aid.
Two of the arrays shall each have at least 10 x 10 lenslets when
operating with 7.35 subapertures across the telescope pupil; 14 x 14 lenslets
are strongly preferred if they can be provided at no significant additional
cost. The smaller number of lenslets allows a partial but potentially very
useful turbulent-layer conjugation capability to be implemented as a
minimal-cost upgrade. The larger number would be needed for conjugation over
the full field but further modifications to the WFS would be required to
realise this capability fully (see Section 2.7). One of the arrays shall be
designed for use with moderate to good seeing conditions (ro
³13 cm) and the other shall be for poor seeing
conditions (ro
< 13 cm). The size of each lenslet (subaperture) is expected to in the range
0.5 x 0.5 mm 2 to 2 x 2 mm
2 . This range should be consistent with commercially available arrays
and keep aberrations to a minimum. The third array will have a nominal 8
x 8 lenslets when operating with a nominal 3.68 subapertures per pupil
diameter. It is intended for occasional use when such an array may provide a
performance advantage, e.g. at very low light levels. The WFS supplier shall
determine the number providing optimum performance; assistance and advice may
be sought from the project if required. Selection of the number of subapertures
for spatial descoping is subject to project approval.
The lens arrays shall have a fill factor of ³ 98 percent. When used with monochromatic radiation of wavelength l (where l= 0.65 µm), the wavefront quality shall be better than l/4 peak-to-peak. Chromatic aberration shall not increase the image size
at the detector focal plane by more than 10% of the diffraction limit at a
wavelength of 650 nm. Each lens in an
array shall not diffract or scatter more than 2 percent of the incident light
into adjacent subaperture pixel arrays of the CCD.
Ideally the Hartmann spots formed at the CCD should be ³ 1.8 times the CCD pixel size
to give a smooth transfer curve when operating with ³ 4 x 4 pixels/subaperture (see also the “Calibration and Alignment “ section.) Note that, for the
purposes of these specifications, the
diffraction-limited spot size for a square subaperture is defined as 2 x l x focal length /
subaperture width. Because the subaperture sizes will usually be larger than
the visible ro
and the sensor can operate over a broad spectral band, the project recognises
that the spot size will not necessarily be optimum for all atmospheric
turbulence conditions and spectral bandwidths. For design purposes, a
wavelength of 0.65 µm shall be used when
calculating spot size.
Note that all other WFS optics should be sufficiently large to allow
full utilisation of the lenslet array sizes selected, i.e. no hardware changes
should be required to implement at least a limited turbulent-layer conjugation
capability as discussed in Section 2.7. Note that turbulent-layer conjugation
is a system upgrade and it is not a function of the baseline design.
All filters shall be remotely interchangeable. The following spectral
filters shall be provided.
Wavelength Range (µm at FWHM)
0.6 to 0.7
0.5 to 0.8
0.4 to 1.0
(Blank space acceptable)
The peak transmission of each filter shall be ³ 80% with a goal of ³ 90 %. At 0.2 µm outside of the FWHM points and beyond the filters
shall transmit £ 0.1 %. This choice of filters is nominal and it
should be reviewed as part of the work package. Any change from the nominal
specifications requires project approval. Neutral density filters of 1.0 ± 0.1
density and 2.0 ± 0.1 density shall also be provided. The spectral filters and
neutral-density filters shall be independently selectable, i.e., separate
filter wheels or slides for each type. Provision shall be made to accommodate
an additional three spectral filters, e.g. broad band and notch filters with
the latter eliminating scattered light from the DM figure monitor. All filters
shall be manually removable from their holders for replacement by other filters
of the same size if desired by the user.
An atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) shall be
provided to correct for atmospheric dispersion at zenith angles up to 60
degrees over at least the 0.5 µm to 0.8 µm spectral region. For convenience in setup and alignment the
design may be nulled in angular deviation and pupil displacement for the He-Ne
laser wavelength of 632.8 nm. The ADC
shall provide null dispersion at zenith. The design should bring the residual
dispersions to approximately the same value at wavelengths of 0.5 µm and 0.8 µm
. The maximum residual dispersions at these wavelengths as a function of zenith angle are given in Table
2 below. This table also shows the maximum pupil shift from null, expressed as
a percentage of the subaperture width, over the 0.5 µm to 0.8 µm spectral
region as a function of zenith angle.
Table
2. ADC Maximum Residual Dispersion and Pupil Shift
Zenith Angle
(degrees) |
Residual
Dispersion (arcsecond) |
Maximum Pupil
Shift (% of
subaperture) |
30 |
0.02 |
3 |
45 |
0.04 |
5 |
60 |
0.06 |
8 |
The ADC shall have a clear aperture equivalent to at least 14 subaperture widths
(for 7.35 subapertures/pupil) to accommodate off-axis guide stars when
conjugating to the turbulent layer. The ADC shall be remotely controlled with a
rotational accuracy of £ 1 degree.
If difficulty is encountered in meeting the
pupil-shift specification, then the following approach is acceptable to the
project. Before starting an observation the ADC is set for the mean guide-star
angle and, if necessary, the deformable mirror is laterally aligned to the
lenslet array using its x-y stage. The differential pupil shift (chromatic and
mean position) over the duration of the observation (1-hour maximum) must not
exceed 3% .
The optical quality shall be such that the
requirements of Section 2.1 are satisfied. Any
pointing error introduced by the ADC shall not exceed 0.05 arcsecond in
object space for any zenith angle change of at least 15 degrees within the
specified range of 60 degrees. An EPICS interface is required for control of
the ADC,
An electronic shutter is required. The shutter
response time shall be < 75 milliseconds to prevent CCD damage if the NCU
He-Ne laser is inadvertently focused on the CCD under worst-case conditions. An
EPICS interface shall be provided for external control of the shutter. In the
absence of electrical power the shutter shall be closed. The shutter’s location
in the optical train is not critical provided the optical path beyond the
shutter is properly enclosed to prevent any stray light from reaching the CCD.
Optics shall be provided for various calibration purposes as specified
in Section 5.0 on Calibration and Alignment.
The combination of the 80 x 80 pixel CCD with a 10 x 10 lenslet array
will allow the upgrade to a turbulent-layer conjugation capability to be
carried out with no hardware changes to the WFS. With this configuration a
field of at least 102 arcseconds diameter without vignetting can be covered for
a dominant turbulent layer at a height of 3 km above the telescope. If 14 x 14
lenslet arrays are provided, the feasibility of installing remotely-driven
stages to allow the CCD/relay-lens assembly to track the illuminated lenslet
area should be assessed. A concise technical explanation should be given if
this is not practical . This task should not involve significant design effort.
Note that turbulent-layer conjugation is not a function of the baseline NAOMI
system and the installation of such stages, if feasible, would be an upgrade.
The WFS CCD camera and its controller will either be supplied by the
adaptive optics project or they will approve the choice. The specifications are
based on performance claims for existing high performance CCDs.
A CCD with a minimum of 4 ports is required. The CCD should have two
readout rates that will be electronically switchable without recabling; a
moderate priority goal is for on-the-fly (loop closed) switching. Under some conditions, e.g. good seeing with
low wind speeds, one will be able to use a longer read latency and thus operate
the CCD with lower readout noise. At 100 kilopixels/second/port the CCD should
have £ 3 noise electrons/pixel with a goal of £ 2 noise electrons/pixel and at the maximum readout
rate the readout noise should be £ 7 noise electrons/pixel with a goal of £ 5 noise electrons/pixel. The maximum readout rate
applies when operating with 4 x 4 binning (with guard “ring”) over all
subapertures with a latency of £
250 µsec.
The binning of pixel arrays, e.g. to operate in a quad cell mode, for
readout-noise reduction is required. Readout formats should accommodate
selection of sub-arrays of pixels within each subaperture array, e.g. 6 x 6
(acquisition only), 4 x 4 pixels.
Provided the
Shack-Hartmann concept is maintained, non-standard approaches
to meeting the
speed and noise requirements across their full range may be
considered but
any such approaches must be modelled or otherwise
demonstrated to
work and to be cost effective to the satisfaction of the
Project Engineer.
The quantum efficiency should exceed 80 % over the 0.5 µm to 0.8 µm
spectral region with a peak of > 90 %.
The pixel intensity data should be digitized to 12 bits.
The wavefront processor must perform several
functions. First it provides a corrected intensity value for each CCD pixel in
the subaperture arrays. This correction takes into account any background
offset and variations in the quantum efficiency of the CCD pixels. The corrected intensity Ip for a
pixel p is given by the following
equation.
Ip
= ( Cp
- Bp
) Gp
where Cp
= uncorrected intensity
Bp = background
offset
Gp = inverse of
pixel quantum efficiency.
The wavefront processor shall have a serial output port to provide the
corrected pixel intensity data to a real-time display and a data recording
system. The processor shall have the capability to set a low light level flag
for any pixel data that fall below an operator-selected limit, e.g. 100 photons
per pixel. In this event the operator shall also have the option to set the
calculated phase gradient value to zero.
The phase gradients for each
subaperture shall be calculated separately for the x and y axes of the CCD. The
algorithm used to calculate the phase gradient will depend on the pixel
configuration selected, e.g. 4 x 4 pixels, 2 x 2 pixels. With the provision
that the performance specifications must be satisfied, the wavefront sensor
supplier may select the algorithm for each pixel configuration. The centroid
position shall then be converted to a phase gradient value through a tilt gain.
This tilt gain is predetermined for the x and y axes of each subaperture as
part of the calibration process (see section
on calibration and alignment).
The final step performed by the wavefront processor shall be to correct
for non-common path aberrations and focused-spot offsets caused by errors in
the lens array. This step allows for effects seen only by the wavefront sensor
that must not be included in the correction provided by the deformable mirror.
The approach to the calibration of non-common path aberrations will be
determined by the optical chassis supplier. These values shall be subtracted
from the phase gradients measured during normal operation.
The wavefront processor shall maintain the 12-bit precision of the CCD
camera data. The time to read out the CCD data and provide the phase gradients
shall not exceed 250 µsec with 4 x 4 pixels/subaperture. The capability to
sample the data stream at all stages of the processing shall be provided.
The design shall allow several calibration functions to be performed.
These shall include at least the following:
1. The determination of WFS transfer curves. (Range, linearity and tilt
gain information can be obtained from these curves.)
2. The calibration of WFS errors, e.g. Hartmann spot offset errors due
to aberrations in the WFS optics.
3. The calibration of CCD camera errors.
Provision shall be made to inject a reference
wavefront from a light source at or
close to the AO-corrected f/16.8 focus. As a design goal the WFS calibration
unit feed should be over the top of the pickoff or in its vicinity. If
packaging constraints present significant problems, the WFS supplier has the
option of inserting the source beyond the pick-off but before the WFS
collimating lens provided the calibration functions are shown to be still
valid. This source will be used to perform the first two calibration functions
specified above and possibly the third. Light from this source will pass
through the WFS collimating lens to produce a plane wavefront. The tilt of this
plane wavefront shall be remotely and independently variable in the x and y
axes over the maximum operational phase gradient range of the wavefront sensor.
This function may be provided by the WFS pick-off stage. The wavefront tip/tilt
shall be calibrated by independent means to an accuracy at least a factor of
two (2) better than that required for
the wavefront sensor. The spectral bandwidth of the source shall cover
0.4 µm to 1 µm. Its radiant intensity integrated over this bandwidth shall be
at least 3 x 10-8 W ster-1 but it shall not be high enough
to saturate any CCD pixels. The radiant intensity should be uniform over the
f/16.8 beam. The spectral distribution shall match that of a star in the
spectral class range G0 to K0. A slot shall be provided for the manual
insertion of an additional filter if the need arises to modify the source
brightness or spectral characteristics.
The space and interface requirements for this source shall be provided
to the optical-chassis supplier to avoid any potential conflict with the
optical chassis design.
Transfer curves shall be generated to assess the
linearity and range of the wavefront sensor. A transfer curve is defined as a
plot of the measured phase gradient versus the actual input-wavefront phase
gradient for a subaperture. The ideal sensor should have a transfer curve that
passes through the origin with a slope of unity. Except when operating in a 2 x
2 pixel mode, the transfer curve should vary by less than ± 15 percent to
provide adequate servo stability.
A radiometric calibration source shall be provided to
calibrate the pixel responsivity of the CCD pixels, i.e. to perform flat
fielding. The source may be the same source used to generate the plane
wavefront for the phase-gradient calibration. In this event provision must be
made to easily remove and replace the lenslet array , i.e. to allow the central
region of the collimated beam to fall on the CCD. Any diffusers that may be
required to produce the required illumination uniformity may be inserted
manually as flat fielding is expected to be an infrequent operation. The source
brightness shall be equivalent to at least a magnitude-8 star. The source shall
allow measurements of the relative gain of each pixel to be measured over any
0.1-µm region within the 0.4 µm to 1.0 µm spectral band. The accuracy of the
gain calibration shall be £ 1% rms. The CCD shall have a
remotely controlled shutter to allow measurement and recording of the fixed
pattern noise. The background offset of each pixel (see Section 4.0) shall be
determined to within 1 electron per sensor integration period (usually < 25
ms); the ability to determine the average offset over several (>10)
consecutive frames is required. The probability that the measurement error is ³ 1 electron shall be £0.3.
A manual adjustment capability to initially centre each lenslet array on the WFS optical
axis must be provided. Note that the adjustment may be performed using an
external jig or alignment fixture. . The resolution of the adjustment mechanism
should be sufficient to achieve an alignment accuracy of better than 0.025 of the deformable-mirror centre-to-centre
segment spacing. The remote adjustments to switch between the lenslet arrays
shall maintain these alignment accuracy requirements. Note that in routine
operation fine adjustment of the deformable mirror image to the lenslet arrays
will be performed by moving the deformable mirror on a 2-axis remotely
controlled stage.
A pupil fiducial mask, interchangeable with the lenslet
arrays, is required as an alignment aid. The mask shall indicate the required
position of the optical system’s exit pupil at the location normally occupied
by a lenslet array. The mask may consist of a circle inscribed on a glass plate
with the circle diameter equal to the desired pupil diameter. The optimum
design for this mask shall be determined by the WFS supplier in consultation
with the optical-chassis supplier.
The z-axis (or focus) range shall be sufficient to
allow imaging of either the Hartmann spots or the lenslet array on the CCD. A
10% range contingency should be added.
All adjustments must have sufficient resolution and
range to satisfy the measurement range and accuracy requirements given in
Section 1.4.
The CCD should have x and y adjustments for initial
positioning of the CCD to the optical axis of the relay lens(es). These
adjustment may be manual. The manual z-axis motion should be sufficient to
accommodate any departure of the relay-optic focal length from its nominal
value and to adjust the reduction factor as required.Note that the use of shims
for the fine adjustment of the CCD to relay lens separation is acceptable.
The filter lateral positions are not critical provided
each is positioned so that all light falls within the clear aperture. Any wedge
in the filters must be such that all specifications are satisfied.
The rotation accuracy of the ADC should be < 1
degree. The alignment shall also satisfy the relevant requirements of Section
2.4.
The shutter position is not critical provided its
aperture does not vignette any beam.
An independent control module is required for
laboratory tests of the WFS as a separate assembly. This module should exercise
sufficient control to demonstrate the basic WFS functions.
The overall requirements are driven by Clauses 17 and
21.
All WFS components within the GHRIL shall operate
within specification over a temperature range of -5oC
to 30oC
in relative humidity from 0% to 95%. Any prediction of failure to satisfy this
requirement shall be briefly documented and submitted to the AO project
manager. An environmentally conditioned
enclosure for the WFS will not be part of the baseline system. Note that while
certain components, e.g. rack-mounted electronic components, may be housed in
environments with temperature excursions less extreme than specified above in
normal operation, the system must be able to cope with a start-up from a
lengthy powered-down state within the GHRIL environment. For example the heat
generated by electronic components in normal operation may keep the interior of
a rack well above - 5oC
when powered up and therefore apparently allow components specified to 0oC
to be used, but these components could fail on a cold start. Any special
measures to control the temperature of components must not only comply with
Clause 21 but also require project approval. The free atmosphere temperature variation expected within the GHRIL
is typically £ 1 oC
/ hour; this variation is important when designing the WFS to meet the
requirements of Clause 5 (see Section 7.2 below). All WFS components within the
GHRIL shall be able to survive relative humidity of 100% in storage. Protective
measures may be employed, subject to project approval, to guard against extreme
conditions when the equipment is not operating or in storage.
All equipment must operate to specification at an
altitude of 2500 m.
Equipment shall be designed to an EMC specification to
be defined by consultation between the WFS supplier and the ING. (See Section
1.3.15 of the ING Instrument Design Specifications, Draft Version 1.0, 27th
February 1997, for the current requirements.)
The baseline WFS will have only a cover over the
module that can be sealed for dust protection when the system is not in
use.
There will be local cooling of all heat sources in the
GHRIL, either by liquid or air. The heat will be taken to the global GHRIL
environment heat removal system. Global control of the GHRIL environment is the
responsibility of ING. The WFS supplier will be expected to work closely with
ING and the AO project in this area. All electronic heat sources not associated
with motors or drivers which must be on the bench should be above or away from
the bench. In accordance with Clause 21, the combined opto-mechanical bench,
DM, FSM and WFS thermal sources must not degrade the uncorrected local seeing
by more than 0.1 arcsecond with a goal of no detectable degradation.
Any equipment installed in the WHT control room must operate to
specification over a temperature range of 5oC to 30oC
at relative humidities ranging from 0% to 80%.
Attention is drawn to the severe dust environment at
the Observatory. Section 1.2.4 of the ING Instrument Design Specifications
addresses measures to protect against
dust.
Note that the temperature and humidity ranges
specified above have been changed to reflect the draft requirements of the ING
Instrument Design Specifications.
All AO components and their mounts shall exhibit good
stability consistent with the optical and environmental requirements. In
particular the WFS shall be designed such that the performance specified in
Clauses 1, 2 and 3 is achieved for integrations up to 1 hour without
recalibration, provided the telescope alignment and focus stability does not
limit the system performance. This requirement is driven by Clause 5. As a
design goal the WFS position should not drift over a 1-hour period by more than
5 µm in any axis relative to the intersection of the AO system’s optical axis
with the corrected f/16.8 focal plane. For design purposes the optical axis
shall be assumed to remain fixed relative to the GHRIL table over this period.
Uncorrectable tip/tilt jitter induced by WFS vibration
sources shall not exceed 17 nrad rms
(0.0035 arcsecond rms) in object space. Uncorrectable tip/tilt jitter is jitter
beyond the response of the AO system. Microphonic effects are also included in
this specification.
Cleaning procedures must be developed for all optical
components and successfully demonstrated on witness samples of all coatings
prior to use on the AO optical system.
All such procedures must be adequately documented for
use by optical technicians or engineers.
Figures 2 and 3 show the system
error budgets for Clauses 1 and 2 respectively. For
consistency all errors have been expressed as phase variances in radian2 at a wavelength of 2.2
µm. In parts of some work packages the errors have been converted to units that
are more appropriate and easier to interpret. The error budgets are similar to
those shown and discussed in earlier documents except that the ELECTRA DM’s
smaller fitting error and the effect of the larger subaperture size (57 x 57 cm2)
have been taken into account.
Figure 2. Clause 1 error
budget.
Figure 2 shows the Clause 1 error budget. With the change from a
continuous facesheet DM to the segmented ELECTRA DM, fitting error is no longer
the dominant effect. Because the light level is high, i.e. magnitude 8 star,
the wavefront sensor errors are small. The budget assumes that the wavefront
sensor CCD has been calibrated to specification and the pixel size errors do
not exceed 1 µm rms. A conventional centroiding algorithm was used in determining the budget for the
CCD errors. The tip/tilt jitter
includes an allowance of 30 nrad (0.006
arcsec) rms for jitter on the optical bench induced by telescope motion and
moving bench components; this jitter is in addition to the 70-nrad (0.015
arcsec) rms residual jitter from the WFS-FSM subsystem. The “misregistration”
box refers to errors associated with the incorrect mapping of the mirror
actuators at the wavefront-sensor lenslet array, e.g. due to a non-zero
incident angle at the deformable mirror. The optical design is such that the
deformable mirror is imaged at the lenslet array. The allowance for the
uncorrected wavefront error includes only those errors specified for the AO
system. The contribution from the WHT optics was not known at the time of
writing but this information is being sought.
The error budget in Figure 2 gives a Strehl ratio of 0.76 which is
comfortably above the specified value of 0.65 for Clause 1
The ability to satisfy Clause 2 requires that the system operate with
faint stars, e.g. visual magnitude of at least 15 or 16. The error budget shown in Figure 3 is for an
Figure 3. Clause 2
error budget.
on-axis visual magnitude 16 guide star; operation with a
dichroic beamsplitter that allows the WFS to be used over its maximum spectral
bandwidth was assumed. Section 5.4.2 of the NAOMI technical description
document (AOW/GEN/AJL/7.0/07/96) presents the expected number of detected
photons for various spectral classes of 16th magnitude stars; several classes
exceed the error-budget number. An integration time close to the assumed
atmospheric time constant was used. In accordance with Clause 2, the time
constant assumed atmospheric conditions equivalent to a single turbulent layer
moving at 10 m/sec at 3 km above the telescope. The error budget assumed that
two benefits of the long integration time were a slower CCD readout rate and
reduced readout noise. Specifications on readout rates and noise are covered in
Section 3.0 above. The Clause 2 error budget takes into account the
increase in sources of error such as photon noise expected at these low light
levels. The Clause-2 analysis brought out the need for accurate calibration of
the CCD background offset as covered in Section 5.1 above.
Note that several simplifying assumptions were made in deriving the
error budgets and there are some small sources of error that have been omitted.
However, preliminary propagation code results appear to support the overall
performance predictions of the error-budget analyses.
This section covers support and interface requirements not addressed
above.
The document AOW/SYS/RMM/6.0/01/97/NAOMI Electronics and software
interfaces is a preliminary guide to the system interface requirements.
Documentation shall be supplied in accordance with Clause 14.
Where appropriate, the same type of electronic components should be
used as are already in use at the ING. Where other components are used a
minimum of one spare for each type shall be supplied in accordance with Clause
19.
As required by Clause 20, NAOMI software shall be written to standards
agreed with the ING. Note that any references to software in this WPD refer to
the software needed for the WFS mechanism control. A draft software standards
document has been prepared by Paul Rees. See the latest version for guidance.
In accordance with Clause 11, any NAOMI interface to the telescope or
any instrument control system shall be via DRAMA and shall conform to ING
networking standards.
Any limitations on cable lengths that may severely restrict the
location of components on or around the GHRIL table should be reported to the
project.
The work package will be subject to Preliminary Design and Critical
Design Reviews. The document AOW/MAN/AJL/8.0/07/96 CoDR, PDR and CDR
Definitions gives some guidelines as to what levels of design, modelling and
costing are expected at each of these stages. It also gives guidelines on the
preparation of procedures, e.g. for alignment and calibration, and the level of
detail required. Further PDR information is given in AOW/WFS/RAH/1.1/01/97/
Wavefront Sensor PDR Requirements. In
addition to the PDR and CDR, the WFS supplier will also be expected to
participate in the System Design
Reviews. These are also covered in the document AOW/MAN/AJL/8.0/07/96. The
first System Design Review is addressed in AOW/SYS/AJL/6.0/01/97/ 1st Design
Review Requirements.
In addition to the WFS and all associated hardware,
other deliverables include software and licenses, review documents, test procedures
and reports, reports on analyses and simulations, user manuals, and test
equipment paid for by the project. Also see Section 25 of the NAOMI technical
description document (AOW/GEN/AJL/7.0/07/96) for further information.
The delivery location is the WHT, La Palma.
Intermediate delivery to the location
for system integration (TBD) is also required.