Baseline Optical Chassis Work Package Description
wht-naomi-56
Document Number AOW/SUB/RAH/5.54/063/082/987/OMC WPD
Version date 0273/022/987
CONTENTS
1. Optical Chassis Functional Requirements
1.1 Introduction and General Requirements
1.2 Space Allocation 7
1.3 Environmental Requirements 11
2. Common-Path Optics 12
2.1 Deformable Mirror and Drivers 12
2.2 Fast Steering Mirror 14
3. Science Path 16
4. WFS and Tip/tilt sensor Optical Paths 17
5. Optical Science Port 17
6. Alignment and Calibration 18
6.1 General Requirements 18
6.2 Calibration Sources at Nasmyth Focus 18
6.3 Wavefront-Sensor Calibration Source 21
6.4 Calibration of Non-Common Path wavefront Errors 21
7. Additional Support and Interface Requirements 21
8. Error Budgets 22
9. Reviews and procedures 24
10. Deliverable items 24
This document should be read in conjunction with the
AOW/GEN/AJL/6.8/07/96/WP Cover Document which references several other relevant
documents and the AOW/SYS/RMM/6.2/01/97/NAOMI S & O Requirements document.
Together these documents constitute the current requirements for NAOMI (Nasmyth
AO system for Multiple-Purpose Instrumentation). (These documents are from time
to time updated by their authors; readers can ensure they have the latest
versions by checking with the Project Manager.)
The optical chassis is defined as the entire
adaptive-optics optical train with the exception of the wavefront sensor (WFS)
and the WHT. It includes the optical components, their mounts, adjustment
mechanisms, calibration sources and the support structures (i.e. baseplates or
equivalent) for the optics. The baseline design will have the capability to be
readily upgraded to accommodate
additional features, e.g. a tip/tilt sensor, turbulent-layer conjugation, when
funds become available.
The optical train may be divided into several optical
paths. The functions of these paths are summarised below. More detailed
information is provided later in the document.
a. The common-path
optics must perform at least the following functions:
Interface with the WHT Nasmyth focus and the
calibration/alignment source.
Provide optics for imaging the WHT pupil at the deformable mirror and the WFS
entrance pupil.
Ensure that the components have sufficient aperture to
allow the future implementation of turbulent-layer conjugation.
Include and accommodate the adaptive optics
components, i.e. the deformable mirror (DM) and the fast steering mirror.
Provide access for a simple interferometer to
monitor the DM surface.
Provide an AO-corrected focal plane where light may be
directed to the science instrument, the WFS and an optical science port as
required.
b. The science-path optics
will select the wavelength region used by the science instrument and provide a corrected image at the appropriate
plate scale over the instrument’s field of view (FOV). (Wavelength selection
should be performed with a dichroic beamsplitter.) The science optics must
provide a well defined and accessible pupil image and focal plane to which an
IR science instrument can be coupled.
c. The WFS pick-off optics will allow guide stars
to be selected within the available FOV and direct the light from the guide
star to the WFS. Note that the selection of the design concept for the pick-off
optics is the responsibility of the optical-chassis supplier but implementation
is the responsibility of the WFS WP supplier. The guide stars may be within or
outside the science FOV. Provision must be made for future operation of the
wavefront sensor with a laser guide star in the sodium layer. The optics must
also maintain the registration of the deformable mirror with WFS lenslet array
independent of the guide-star position. The WFS pick-off must function to
specification in the presence of dithering as required by Science Clause 4.
Provision must be made to accommodate a separate tip/tilt sensor needed when
the system is upgraded to operate with laser guide stars.
d. The optical science path
will provide a partially corrected FOV for use by visible science
instrumentation. The initial applications will be for
testing the AO correction at optical wavelengths compared to the image from the
pre-correction camera and the use ofas an additional acquisition
camera. The optics will utilise that section of the FOV not obscured by the
pick-off to the WFS. Note that the AO system is not primarily intended to
provide high image quality in the visible spectral region and the utility of
this port may be limited (see Clause 10).
e. The calibration and
alignment optics will provide sources conjugate to the Nasmyth focal plane
for calibration and alignment purposes. The calibration optics will include
provision for a WHT-pupil simulator. Provision must be made for distortion
mapping of the AO optical train; off-axis positioning of the calibration source
is required to accomplish this function. A calibration source is also required
for calibration of the wavefront sensor; this source will be injected at the
system’s AO-corrected f/16.8 focus although this is the responsibility of the
WFS WP supplier.
The optical path to the science instrumentation port
shall follow good design practice for infrared operation, e.g. minimum number
of surfaces, low emissivity components (see Clause 24). The design should be
configured to allow adequate space for existing and future science
instrumentation. The space requirements for optical mounts, mechanisms to move
components, bench-mounted electronics, cameras and cables should be taken into
account.
Consideration shall be given to the use of materials
and techniques to reduce the effects of temperature changes within the GHRIL.
The minimum supporting analysis shall include a first-order study to assess the
system’s temperature sensitivity. The analysis should demonstrate that the
system performance will satisfy all specifications when operating within the
GHRIL temperature limits. No direct control of optical surface temperatures
(other than those already cooled in the science instrumentation) should be
considered. Local heat sources should be controlled and there will provision to
remove heat from the GHRIL.
A modular-build approach should be followed to provide
a maximum of four independent but accurately relocatable modules on the
existing optical bench (size 1.35 m x 2.5 m) with a maximum of four electronics
racks. (Note that the wavefront-sensor module and its electronics are not
included in these numbers.) Power and other supplies, e.g. liquid coolant,
should be connected through well-designed umbilicals.
As a goal,
removal of all equipment by hand is desired but use of a hoist is acceptable.
The modules should require only the simplest possible handling trolley for safe
transport. In accordance with Clause 13,
it shall be possible to install and align the equipment within 8 hours and to remove it to a WHT storage
point in 4 hours. A maximum of two people shall be needed to carry out these
operations.
The design must allow certain upgrades to be readily
incorporated. In particular the system shall be designed to permit an upgrade
to Na laser beacon operation. This upgrade will allow high Strehl ratios to be
obtained at K band with the sky coverage limited only by the availability of
tip-tilt guide stars. The main consequence of this requirement is that
sufficient space be left to install a separate tip-tilt sensor with its
pick-off. Note that the WFS for the baseline system may later be used as a
tip/tilt sensor and a new WFS will be constructed for use with laser guide
stars.
The detailed specifications which follow contain
references to the applicable science clauses where appropriate.
The design shall allow selection of either of the two
operating modes defined below. These modes are referred to by number elsewhere
in the specifications. Note that the centre of the science field will always
lie on the system’s optical axis.
1. The
WFS uses the science object or a guide
star in the science field.
2. The WFS
uses a guide star outside the science field.
The common path optics shall transmit radiation from
0.4 µm to ³ 4.1 µm wavelength. The science path shall transmit
radiation from 0.8 µm to ³ 4.1 µm wavelength. The WFS path shall transmit
wavelengths from 0.4 µm to ³ 1 µm. Note that when the guide
star is within the science field (Mode 1) the upper wavelength limit for the
WFS is nominally 0.8 µm although Clause 3 (see Section 1.1.6 below) requires
some transmission of longer wavelength radiation to the WFS.
Table 1 specifies the minimum transmission required
from the Nasmyth focus to the input to the WFS. The mode numbers are those
given in Section 1.1.4 above.
Transmission values refer to the average over the specified spectral band.
Specific requirements are not given for wavelengths in the 0.4 µm to 0.5 µm
region where the transmission shall be on a “best effort” basis without
requiring new coating development or extensive study.
Table
1
Mode |
Bandwidth (µm) |
Transmission |
1 |
0.50 to 0.8 |
0.58 |
2 |
0.50 to 1.0 |
0.83 |
Mode 1 is in accordance with Clause 9. In accordance
with Clause 3, the NAOMI system alone shall have a throughput of > 70% to
the infrared science port at wavelengths > 1 µm and a throughput to the WFS >
25% at wavelengths from 0.9 µm to 1 µm.
These specifications are independent of the
polarisation.
All optical coatings must be such that the
transmission specifications are satisfied for a minimum period of one year. The
use of approved cleaning procedures, as specified below in Section 1.3.3, is acceptable.
All mirror coatings beyond the Nasmyth focus shall be
selected for maximum reflectivity above 500 nm wavelength. An upper limit to the emissivity at 2.2 µm
and longer wavelengths of the total optical path to the science instrument’s
cryostat window excluding the telescope shall be 20% with a goal of £16% Clause 24). Note that this requirement has implications for
maintaining a clean GHRIL room and protecting surfaces from dust and oil.
Within the clear aperture of
each optical component, the cosmetic surface quality shall be 5/3 x 0.40; K2 x
0.06 in accordance with DIN 3140. The surface roughness shall be £ 1 nm rms.(Note that this specification may be relaxed for components
that are particularly difficult to manufacture provided analysis indicates no
significant effect on the scattered light. Project approval is required for any
such changes.)
For the baseline design the WHT pupil will be imaged
at the deformable mirror. The size of the pupil at the deformable mirror shall
be 56 mm diameter. The exit pupil of the telescope has a diameter of 1.17 m at
a distance of 12.84 m from the Nasmyth focus.
The limited turbulence profiles currently available
for the La Palma site indicate that measures to reduce angular anisoplanatic
effects are required to satisfy sky coverage specification of Clause 2.
Assuming that a dominant turbulent layer exists, one measure is to make
corrections at a conjugate of this layer. Preliminary analysis indicates that
this approach may offer a significant performance advantage but further
analysis and expansion of the JOSE data base are required. No optics intended
solely for turbulent-layer conjugation are to be included in the baseline
design. Sufficient space must be set aside to allow installation of these
optics and associated mechanisms as part of a system upgrade. These optics are
likely to be lenses that are remotely inserted at or near the Nasmyth focus. In
addition, the common-path optics excluding the deformable mirror and fast
steering mirror shall have sufficient clear aperture to allow conjugation over
the 2.9 arcminute field without vignetting to a turbulent layer at 3 km above
the telescope. (Note that in practice this may require increasing the aperture
of only one component.) The specified clear aperture of 120 mm diameter for the
fast steering mirror (see Section 2.2.2) is at least sufficient to allow
conjugation (when implemented) over at least a 102 arcsecond field without
vignetting for a dominant turbulent layer at 3 km above the telescope.
The design shall maintain the closed loop performance
to specification while dithering in accordance with Science Clause 4. There shall be no shift of the pupil image
relayed to the science instrument during dithering. The design concept for
dithering shall be the responsibility of the optical chassis supplier.
Dithering will make use of the WFS pick-off translation stages which is the
responsibility of the wavefront sensor supplier. More information is given in
the Baseline Wavefront Sensor WPD (AOW/SUB/RAH/6.62/031/97).
The need to keep the number of optical surfaces in the
science-instrumentation path to a minimum will probably place constraints on
the optical performance. The wavefront specifications take into account both
these design difficulties and the anticipated science needs within the
projected operating period of NAOMI.
The uncorrected wavefront error introduced by the
optics over the path from the Nasmyth focus to the science instrumentation port
shall be £ 150 nm rms over the central 1-arcminute diameter
field. The baseline AO system will usually operate with 7.35 square
subapertures across the WHT pupil. Within any subaperture the on-axis
common/science-path wavefront error shall be £ 30 nm rms;
this high spatial frequency error will not be corrected by the AO system. The
off-axis uncorrectable error over this field shall be < 50 nm rms for any
subaperture within the pupil. These specifications include design, fabrication
and alignment errors except for those introduced by the WHT optics, the
deformable mirror and fast steering mirror. Note in particular that the
atmospheric-turbulence fitting error is not covered by these specifications.
This error is addressed in Section 2.1.4.
Within a 2-arcminute diameter field the design goal
for the pupil wavefront error shall be £ 170 nm rms with a
maximum of 200 nm rms. At the edge of the field (2.9-arcminute diameter) the
goal shall be £ 265 nm rms with a maximum of 300 nm rms. The same
exceptions given in the preceding paragraph apply.
Performance predictions over the field shall be
supplied with the proposed design. The results should be presented as rms and
peak-to-valley wavefront errors and in the form of spot diagrams shown relative
to the Airy disc size at 2.2 µm wavelength.
Non-common path wavefront errors between the science
path and the WFS should not exceed 100 nm rms. The ray trace results should
show spot diagrams for representative
WFS subapertures which fall within the
Airy disc diameter at 0.6-µm wavelength. Note that reduction of chromatic
aberrations below 0.5-µm wavelength is not critical and, as a design goal, the
aberrations should not produce a spot more than 10% larger than the
diffraction-limited diameter. The optical design results should indicate the
variation in non-common path wavefront error over the field; these results are
needed to assess the difficulty of calibrating out the errors.
Refocusing of the WFS, e.g. to remove field curvature,
is acceptable for guide stars located outside of the science field.
The optical system aberrations can introduce
undesirable offsets of the Hartmann spots at the WFS detector. Using nominal
design data for the WFS optics, the optical chassis supplier shall determine
the predicted magnitude of the spot offsets due to the common path optics and
the WFS optics respectively. The offsets should be determined at least at field
angles of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.4 arcminutes off axis. These results shall be used to
determine an allotment for the WFS optical aberrations in accordance with
Section 2.1 of the Baseline Wavefront Sensor WPD (Document AOW/SUB/RAH/6.64/031/97). The allotment is subject to
project review and approval.
Any proposed use of conventional beamsplitters, i.e.
glass plates or cube beamsplitters, must be supported by evidence that adequate
measures will be taken to minimise aberrations and significantly attenuate
second surface reflections In particular the dichroic beamsplitter design
should provide optimimum on-axis performance to the optical science path.with
negligible degradation of off-axis performance compared to that without the
beamsplitter. Thus the design approach should provide minimum non-common path
errors between the IR and optical science ports, thus allowing good AO
correction to be simultaneously achieved at these ports. The primary candidate
for the dichroic beamsplitter design shall be a wedge-shaped dichroic followed by compensating plate. Pellicles are
acceptable as beamsplitters provided measures are taken to guard against dust,
damage and microphonic effects.
Measures shall be taken to reduce scattered light to a
minimum in the science instrumentation,
the calibration optics and WFS paths.
Baffles should be used where appropriate and optical mounts should be
black anodised or painted with non-flaking flat black paint. All optical
surfaces should have a low surface roughness, preferably < 1 nm rms. The
optical design should include a first order estimate of the signal/scattered
light ratio at the tip/tilt sensor and WFS when operating with a visual
magnitude 16 star near the galactic equator. An explanation shall be given if a
scattered light analysis is not practical.
The design should follow general good optical practice
in the elimination of ghosting effects and a first order estimate of the
effects of ghosting within the system to be delivered should be given. This
should be done in collaboration within the WFS work package.
A direct line of sight along the length of bench for
access to the Nasmyth focus by an alignment telescope and He-Ne laser shall be
provided. The space required for these components is indicated in Figure 3. If
the removal of optical components or modules is required to obtain the line of
sight, the component or module must be either kinematically mounted or mounted
on a slide. Ease of removal and replacement without requiring realignment are
essential.
No correction for atmospheric dispersion in the
science path is required for the baseline design. The design shall not preclude
the addition of a science-path atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) as a
system upgrade. An ADC will be provided with the WFS but this component is the
responsibility of the WFS supplier.
The height of the Nasmyth-focus optical axis shall be
150 mm above the mounting surface of the GHRIL optical table.
ING standard methods will be used for the control of all standard
mechanised functions
Clause 19 requires that VxWorks
should be used as the operating system for non-specialised (i.e. AO-specific)
local control processors.
Engineering and operational control and status methods will conform to
ING standards.
Potential safety hazards shall be identified and
measures taken to protect personnel, e.g. warning notices, covers with interlocks.
Handling procedures and lifting aids, e.g. eye bolts, shall be provided for
heavy items.
The existing GHRIL optical table will support the
optical chassis and accommodate electronics that must be mounted on or over the
table. Figure 1 indicates the size and
Figure 1. General layout of the GHRIL showing the
existing GHRIL table
and components at the front of the bench..
Figure 2. Space envelope for the front of the existing
GHRIL table.
(View rotated clockwise by 90 degrees).
Figure 3.
Allocation of space on the GHRIL table.
location of this table. Some optical components may need to be mounted
beyond the front edge of the existing table where the space is limited,
particularly in the region of the WHT image derotator. The project will
investigate the possibility of moving the table towards the derotator although
the maximum movement is expected to be only a few cm. Figure 2 shows the space
envelope for the front of the bench. Sufficient space must be provided for the
wavefront sensor (WFS), the upgrade to
laser-guide-star operation, WHIRCAM and future instrumentation as required by
Clause 7. Figure 3 shows the space allocations for the WFS, future science
instrumentation and the laser-guide-star upgrade. Figure 3 is also available as
an AutoCAD file from Tully PeacockColin Dickson
at ROE and in the Drawings area of the NAOMI BSCW facility. The drawing date is
19 December 1996. Detailed dimensions are contained in this file and the file
shall be treated as part of the WPD.
Although the tip/tilt sensor is planned as part of the system upgrade
for laser-guide-star operation, there is a remote possibility that a tip/tilt
sensor may also be required in the near term system.The WFS supplier is
required to establish the feasibility of incorporating a simple tip/tilt sensor
such as fibre-coupled APDs in a quad-cell configuration in the NAOMI optical
train, e.g. at the optical science port. The optical-chassis supplier follow
any work in this area.
Equipment should extend no more than 1 metre above the table surface.
The optical-chassis supplier will be expected to work closely with the project,
the suppliers of the wavefront sensor, the Real-Time Control System and the
appropriate WHT staff.
The overall requirements are driven by Clauses 17 and
21.
That part of the AO system installed in the GHRIL
shall operate within specification over a temperature range of -10oC
to 25oC in relative humidity from 10% to 90%. Any prediction of
failure to satisfy this requirement shall be briefly documented and submitted
to the AO project manager. (Note that the University of Durham intends to
characterise the performance of the ELECTRA deformable mirror as a function of
temperature.) An environmentally conditioned enclosure for the optical chassis
will not be part of the baseline system. Note that whilecertain components,
e.g. rack-mounted electronic components, may be housed in environments with
temperature excursions less extreme than specified above in normal operation,
the system must be able to cope with a start-up from a lengthy powered-down
state within the GHRIL environment. For
example the heat generated by electronic components in normal operation may
keep the interior of a rack well above -10oC when powered up and
therefore apparently allow components specified to 0 oC to be used,
but these components could fail on a cold start. Any special measures to
control the temperature of components must not only comply with Clause 21 but
also require project approval. The maximum free atmosphere temperature
variation expected within the GHRIL is TBD oC / hour; this variation
is important when designing the optical chassis to meet the requirements of
Clause 5. The system shall be able to survive relative humidity of 100%.
Protective measures may be employed, subject to project approval, to guard
against such extreme conditions when the equipment is not operating.
All equipment must operate to specification at an
altitude of 2500 m.
Equipment shall be designed to an EMC specification to
be defined by consultation between the WP supplier and the ING.
The baseline optical chassis will have only covers
over the modules that can be sealed for dust protection when the system is not
in use. The number and shape will be chosen to fit the final layout with a goal
of not more than four.
Equipment in
the GHRIL control room will be cooled by recirculating chilled air through a
roof-mounted heat exchanger which will be designed to handle a maximum load of
4 kW. The heat will be taken to the global GHRIL environment heat removal
system. Global control of the GHRIL environment is the responsibility of ING.
The optical-chassis supplier will be expected to work closely with ING and the
NAOMI project in this area. All electronic heat sources not associated with
motors or drivers which must be on the bench should be above or away from the
bench. In accordance with Clause 21, optical-chassis thermal sources must not
degrade the uncorrected local seeing by more than 0.1 arcsecond with a goal of
no detectable degradation.
Equipment installed in the WHT control room must
operate to specification over a temperature range of 10oC to 30oC.
All AO components and their mounts shall exhibit good
stability consistent with the optical and environmental requirements. In
particular the system shall be designed such that the performance specified in
Clauses 1, 2 and 3 is achieved for integrations up to 1 hour without
recalibration, provided the telescope alignment and focus stability does not
limit the system performance. This requirement is driven by Clause 5.
Uncorrectable tip/tilt jitter induced by vibration
sources both internal and external to the GHRIL shall not exceed 30 nrad rms (0.006 arcsecond rms) in
WHT object space. (Vibration data for the GHRIL are obtainable from the RGO.)
Note that the 30 nrad rms includes an allotment of 17 nrad rms for the WFS on
the assumption that the vibrations are independent and may be root sum squared.
Uncorrectable tip/tilt jitter includes jitter beyond the response of the AO
system and jitter at any frequency within the non-common-path regions between
the science port and the AO components.
Microphonic effects are also included in this specification.
Cleaning procedures must be developed for all optical
components and successfully demonstrated on witness samples of all coatings
prior to use on the AO optical system.
All such procedures must be adequately documented for
use by optical technicians or engineers.
The primary functions of the common path optics were
specified in Section 1.1.2 above. These optics must cover a 2.9 arcminute field
of view which is set by the new WHT image derotator. The common path optics are
essentially a relay stage operating at a magnification of 1.5 with a collimated
region to accommodate the deformable mirror and fast steering mirror. Note that
the latter may be a collimating optic. Any proposal to use a relay stage operating
at a different magnification requires project approval. The common path optics
must provide for an upgrade to a variable conjugation capability as specified
in Section 1.1.9 above. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 specifically address the
deformable mirror and fast steering mirror respectively. The common-path optics
must produce a pupil size of 56 mm diameter at the deformable mirror.
Note that several other specifications given above
apply to the common-path optics and other sections of the optical train.
This section contains information primarily intended
to aid the optical chassis design.
The deformable mirror to be used in the baseline
design is the ELECTRA deformable mirror. The 76-element segmented mirror and
its drivers will be supplied to the project by the University of Durham. The
mirror segments are arranged in a 10 x 10 matrix with each of the 6 corner
segments removed. The centre-to-centre spacing of the mirror segments is 7.62
mm. The nominal gap between the segments is 0.08 mm. Each segment is controlled
by 3 PZT actuators which provide tip, tilt and piston motion. The mirror
segments are coated with aluminium.
The specified pupil diameter of 56 mm gives an AO
system with 7.35 subapertures across the pupil diameter. System modelling
indicates that this configuration provides satisfactory performance. The 56-mm
pupil size was chosen to accommodate an exchange with a “standard” commercially
available mirror with a 7-mm actuator spacing. The ELECTRA mirror segments
beyond the 56 mm pupil diameter will be used to perform turbulent layer
conjugation when the system is upgraded.
The total stroke of each PZT actuator is 6 µm. Up to 2
µm of stroke is required to flatten the mirror surface, thus the available
stroke after flattening is 4 µm. The mirror has built-in strain gauges to
determine the actuators’ positions and provide signals to the electronics that
will correct for actuator hysteresis. These electronics are the responsibility
of the University of Durham. Hysteresis will be reduced to £ 0.7% with a goal of £0.2%.
The atmospheric-turbulence fitting-error coefficient,
µ, provides a simple means of defining how well a deformable mirror can
compensate a wavefront degraded by atmospheric turbulence. The coefficient is
given by the following equation:
s2 = µ ( d
/ ro )5/3
where s2 = variance of the residual wavefront error
d = actuator spacing (57 cm projected at WHT pupil)
ro = atmospheric turbulence coherence
length (³ 8 cm)
With reference to the baseline-system error budgets
for Clauses 1 and 2 we have:
µ = 0.18 (representative of the ELECTRA mirror)
d = 0.57 m
ro = 1.05 m (20-cm visible ro
scaled to 2.2 µm).
Substituting these values in the above equation gives s2 = 0.065
rad2 which is consistent with the error budgets.
Preliminary measurements made by the University of Durham indicate that
the first resonant frequency of the mirror segments is > 2 kHz.
The University of Durham expects the mirror settling
time to be < 400 µs.
The incident angle at the deformable mirror should be £ 10 degrees. The small incidence angle is required to keep the
one-dimensional misregistration between the actuators and the WFS to within the
error-budget allotment
Sufficient space shall be provided to view the DM
clear aperture with a simple interferometer that would not exceed a Zygo
interferometer in size. Normal incidence viewing of the mirror surface is
preferred but viewing at another angle may be acceptable if justification is
given. The configuration need not be confined to a horizontal plane and it may
occlude the main beam. The interferometer will be used for alignment purposes
only.
In accordance with Clause 16 the mirror shall have an operational
lifetime of > 3000 hours subject to
one actuator failure and replacement.
The deformable mirror and its electronics shall be supplied with its
own carrying and transport case (see Clause 23). It shall be possible to remove
and re-install the DM safely, including its electronics, in less than one hour
and without dismantling the rest of the NAOMI system. Only minor further
optical alignment should be required after re-installation, i.e. by using the
remotely controlled x-y stage described in the next section.
The deformable mirror shall
be mounted on a motorised stage with sufficientat least ± 4 mm of travel
along horizontal and vertical axes parallel to the mirror surface to accommodate initial alignment to the WHT pupil image and provide
fine adjustment to the WFS lenslet array. The range requirement for the former, i.e. initial
alignment to the WHT pupil image, shall be
determined as part of the development of the Interface Control Documentation to
be provided by ROE. The range
requirement for the latter shall be determined by analysis and discussions with
the WFS WP supplier. The
stage axes shall be position encoded and repeatable to an accuracy of £ 0.12
mm. The stage will facilitate the initial alignment to
the WHT exit pupil image and the subsequent fine alignment to the WFS lenslets.
The latter operation should involve displacements of £ 1 mm.
The WFS (or a tip/tilt sensor in a future upgrade)
will provide information on overall (or common mode) tilt. This is the tilt
present over the entire WHT pupil and it will be corrected by the fast steering
mirror and to a limited extent by the TCS. There are four sources of tip/tilt
error as listed below.
1. Atmospheric turbulence
2. Pointing jitter of the
WHT
3. Component vibrations
4. WHT long-term pointing
drift
The FSM will use the WFS tip/tilt data to primarily
correct for the first three sources. The tip/tilt mirror significantly reduces
the stroke requirements that would otherwise be placed on the deformable
mirror. DC and large low-frequency tip/tilt errors will be passed on to the TCS
to avoid an excessive range requirement for the FSM.
The FSM and its associated drive circuits should be
based on existing technology that has
been demonstrated to provide high reliability. The FSM may perform two optical
functions, e.g. it may provide tip/tilt correction and also serve as a
collimating optic. This dual function approach has the advantage of reducing
emissivity and increasing transmission. Analysis is required to demonstrate
that a dual-function mirror has no adverse effect on system performance.
Cost considerations and the availability of suitable
existing mirrors require that the mirror clear aperture be limited to 1200
mm diameter. Note that this diameter is at least sufficient to allow
conjugation over a 102-arcsecond field without vignetting for a dominant
turbulent layer at 3 km above the telescope. Note also that
turbulent-conjugation will not be implemented in the baseline design.
The mirror surface shall cover an angular range
of ³ 5001
mmrad over two orthogonal axes with a
design goal of 1 mrad. A smaller range is acceptable at
frequencies above 20 Hz as specified in Section 2.2.4 below.
Provision shall be made to protect the FSM from being
driven to the limits of its operational range, e.g. as the result of excessive
WHT pointing drift. When the FSM has reached a critical point in its range, a
signal shall be sent to the telescope control system to remove the undesired
offset. Determination of the critical point will depend on the rate of drift
and the response of the telescope control system. The WFS and FSM must maintain a stable loop closure during this mode.
As mentioned in Section 2.2.1 above, DC offsets will also be offloaded to the
TCS.
Tilt range
given by: A
lower bound for the total tilt range in both axes over 20 – 250 Hz is given by
R= -0.41
log(frequency) + 1.033
where
R is in milliradians, frequency in Hertz.
Resolution: £ 1.5 mrad
Static (open
loop) jitter: £ 1 mrad rms
Repeatability: £ 4 mrad
Reactionless
to: 250
Hz (Goal: the supplier should indicate what is realistically achievable).
Resonance: >
250 Hz (>500 Hz goal)
Linearity
error: <1%
Pivot
stability: Better
than ± 0.05mm
The mirror surface shall be provided with a durable
coating providing ³ 95 percent reflectance (goal) in the 0.4 µm to 0.5 µm spectral region
and ³ 97 percent reflectance from 0.5 µm to 0.8 µm. Beyond
this region the reflectance shall ³ 98 percent to ³ 4 µm.
Within the specified clear aperture the cosmetic
surface quality shall be 5/3 x 0.40; K2 x 0.06 in accordance with DIN 3140 and
the surface shall be plane (or parabolic) to within 25 nm rms. Within any 1-cm
diameter area inside the clear aperture the surface shall be plane (or
parabolic) to < 10 nm rms. The surface roughness shall be £ 1 nm rms.
As a design goal the mirror shall operate to
specification in any orientation. The intent is to allow for possible future
use in other AO systems, e.g. with a Cassegrain mount.
The mirror assembly shall have a flat surface with
three threaded holes for mounting purposes. Drawings shall be supplied in the
design stage to indicate the mounting configuration.
A mirror cover shall be provided to protect the mirror
surface when not in use.
In accordance with Clause 16, the mirror shouldall
have an operational lifetime > 10,000
hours. It is
appreciated that a supplier is unlikely to give a firm guarantee of the
operational
lifetime, but some assurance of the durability of the unit should be given and
the
design should
allow for rapid and reasonably priced repair.
Clause 7 requires that the
science field of view shall be sufficient to illuminate all of a 1024 x 1024
imaging array fully sampled at the 1.65 micron diffraction limit with no
vignetting. The instrument with this
detector array size is the new
infrared camera (INGRID) that has been under development at RGO.At the time of
writing the goal is that INGRID should be completed at
RGO.
Further
information on this imaging array will be supplied by the INClause
16 further requires that the system shall have a well-defined and accessible
science port around which other instruments such as spectrographs and a
coronograph can be designed.
Subject to
the further information on the configuration and delivery of the 1024 x 1024
imaging array, the near-term requirement is to provide optics to interface with
WHIRCAM. This instrument is a modified UKIRT camera housing a 256 x 256 InSb
array. The camera operates from 0.8 µm to 5 µm with high quantum efficiency.
The science path optics shall provide a plate scale of 0.04 arcsecond/pixel at
WHIRCAM and image the WHT pupil at its Lyot stop.
A single dichroic beamsplitter should be provided to
reflect radiation to INGRIDWHIRCAM.
Any adjustments required for the dichroic beamsplitter shall be manually
controlled. The optical design shall provide sufficient space to allow the
installation of a remotely-controlled assembly with 3 dichroic beamsplitters as
part of the system upgrade.
The system science path without turbulence effects
should provide a diffraction-limited PSF at 1.2 µm (J -band) over a minimum
field diameter of 1 arcminute.
The plate scale should be 335±15 µm/arcsecond (Clause
9).
The image of the telescope pupil should be a distance
of 1100 mm beyond the focus with a diameter of 66.7 mm. (These dimensions are
subject to change. Any change requires project approval.)
The optical layout should provide for future science
instruments a space envelope as shown in Figure 3.
The design concept for the WFS and future tip/tilt
sensor optical pick-offs is the responsibility of the optical-chassis supplier.
Note that the tip/tilt sensor and its pick-off will not be constructed as part
of the baseline design. Note that, as mentioned in Section 1.1.3, the approach
of using the the baseline WFS as a tip/tilt sensor and constructing a new WFS
for the laser-guide-star upgrade is considered acceptable by the project.
Sufficient space must be left to add the tip/tilt sensor and its pick-off as a
system upgrade. Detailed design and
implementation of the WFS pick-off is the responsibility of the WFS supplier.
The pick-offs for the WFS and a tip/tilt sensor should
be located at or near the corrected focal plane of the common-path optics. The
pick-off approach should be such that its aberrations are independent of the
field position. The tip/tilt sensor pick-off should be located before the WFS
pick-off to allow the latter to be refocused when operating with laser guide
stars. The pick-offs will direct f/16.8 beams from the selected guide stars to
the WFS and tip/tilt sensor respectively. Note that the f/16.8 beam assumes
that the common-path relay optics operate at a magnification of 1.5. Any
proposed departure from this magnification must be justified as it affects the
interfaces with other components.
The pick-off optics and their supporting stages will
be the responsibility of the WFS supplier. The optical-chassis supplier will
however be expected to follow the design of these optics and the mechanical
components to ensure a correct interface with the optical chassis. Note that
the WFS module must register against a reference on the adjacent
optical-chassis module with a registration repeatability of < 50 µm in all
three axes. The design of this interface should be the result of collaboration
between the optical-chassis and WFS suppliers. The optical requirements for the
pick-offs given in this section are provided mainly for information purposes.
Mapping of the DM image at the WFS lenslet array must
be maintained over the full field. A field lens should be used to image the
deformable mirror at infinity. Provision of this field lens and its mount is
the responsibility of the optical-chassis supplier. The separation between the
field lens and the AO-corrected focus shall be chosen initially to optimise
performance. Sufficient separation must be provided between
the last element in the OMC optical train and the
AO-corrected focus toand
accommodate the WFS pickoff. A non-optimal separation may be used only if there
is a significant advantage, e.g.extra space, with negligible performance loss.
Any obscuration of the optical science port by the
pick-offs shall be kept to a minimum but the IR science must not be compromised
(Clause 10). An obscuration of < 4 x 4 arcseconds is a design goal. There shall
also be provision to insert a calibration source for the WFS (see Baseline Sensor
WPD, Document AOW/SUB/RAH/6.61/039/976);
this source is the responsibility of the WFS supplier. The optical-chassis
supplier must work with the WFS supplier to determine the interface
requirements.
In accordance with Clause 10, the region of the field
not used by the WFS sensor pick-off shall be made available for use as an
optical acquisition field and possibly by optical science instrumentation
provided this does not in any way compromise infrared science. Note that the AO
system is not designed to provide a high degree of correction at wavelengths
below 0.8 µm.
In accordance with Clause 9, the throughput to the
optical science port shall be > 58% averaged over the 0.5 µm to 0.8 µm
spectral band; the transmission of the WHT optics is not included in this
specification. The f-number of the beam to this port shall be f/16.8.
An acquisition camera will be
provided at the optical science port. At
the time of writing the ING is investigating the possibility of
obtaining a high-performance acquisition camera. Further information will be
provided when available.
In the event that the high performance camera is unavailable, a low
cost CCD video camera will be used. The camera will have a nominal pixel scale
of 0.45 arcsecond/pixel. The video camera should be able to detect stars with V³8. The choice of camera will be driven by cost and availability. It
will cover the full 2.9 arcminute field in at least one axis.
As part of a system upgrade, the low-cost video camera(if used) may be
replaced by a copy of the Gemini acquisition and HRWFS camera, most
probably using the 1024 x 1024 pixel
EEV47 CCD. This camera will operate with a smaller pixel scale (0.17
arcsecond/pixel), view fainter stars
(V>26) and allow detailed inspection of a limited area (£256 x 256 pixels) at ³10 frames/second
The space envelope shown in Figure 3 is available for
use by the acquisition camera.
The design approach to the alignment and calibration functions shall
satisfy the applicable sections of Clauses 6 and 13. In summary Clause 6 requires that the astronomer shall
be able to spend at least 50% of the night integrating on science targets or
astronomical standards. Once installed and aligned the system shall require no
more than 30 minutes to optimise/confirm the alignment in any 24 hour period.
Clause 13 requires that the on-island staff shall be able to install and align
the equipment within 8 hours using no more than two people. Furthermore it
should be possible to carry out pre-use alignment, calibration and testing off
the telescope. A suitable off-telescope mounting base shall be supplied with
NAOMI. Requirements for various alignment and calibration optics are given in
Sections 6.2 to 6.4. Note also the requirement for a line of sight to the
Nasmyth focus as specified previously in Section 1.1.14.
The Nasmyth calibration unit
shall be designed as a module to be mounted on the edge of the GHRIL table
close to the Nasmyth focus. The general requirements are to provide:
1. an on-axis
diffraction-limited (in visible region over full aperture) point source
2 a fast low-amplitude tip/tilt motion of the above source
3. an on-axis
non-diffraction-limited source (approximately 1 arcsecond)
4. a diffraction-limited (at
K band) point source close (2 -3 arcsec) to the axis for science
instrument use
5. an upgrade
capability for a 40-arcsecond diameter flat-field source for IR and optical science
instrument calibration
6. an on-axis f/11 laser beam
for initial alignment
7. a laser pencil beam if
readily implemented
8 a WHT pupil simulator using
a mask
9. a feed for a
pre-correction camera
10. an array of off-axis sources
for mapping the AO optical system distortion and wavefront aberrations over the
field of view
11. a means of generating a known static aberrations
12. an upgrade capability for the future installation of a
turbulence generator for use during laboratory tests
13. neutral density and
spectral filters for controlling the intensity and colour of all broad band
sources listed above.
All of these sources will
effectively propagate from the Nasmyth focus. Further information on the
characteristics and function of these sources is given below.
6.2.2 On-Axis Sources
Provision shall be made to insert remotely a point
source on axis at the f/11 Nasmyth focus. The source shall be sized to appear
as a diffraction-limited point source in the visible region when the entire
f/11 beam is observed. Four other sources, namely a non-diffraction-limited
source, a source which is diffraction limited at K band, an extended
white-light source and a He-Ne laser, will be used less frequently and these
are specified later in this section. The point source will perform several
functions:
a. Provide radiation over at least the 0.5µm to 2.5µm
spectral region for use by the WFS, the acquisition camera and science
instrumentation, e.g. to boresight these components; to calibrate the
common-path and non-common-path wavefront errors.
b. Simulate the WHT exit pupil, e.g. as an alignment aid
for determining the deformable mirror position and for minimising the
difference between laboratory calibrations and sky.
c. Introduce small (variable to 2.6 arcsecond, frequency
0.1 Hz to 150 Hz) motions of the source for functional checks of the AO control
system.
d. Uniformly illuminate the f/11 beam so that when a
pupil of the system is imaged on to the WFS detector each pixel receives the
same signal. This requirement follows from the need to flat-field the WFS
detector.(Note that the WFS supplier is required to provide a separate
flat-field source that bypasses the intervening optics.)
A design using reflecting optical components
is expected. Provision shall be made to replace the source with a sodium lamp
emitting at 589 nm for possible future operation with a sodium-layer laser
guide star. Note that there is no requirement for a detailed design or
procurement of the sodium source.
The
point source shall have a uniform radiant intensity over the f/11 beam equal or
exceeding the values shown in Table 2 below. The maximum radiant intensity
shall not exceed the specified minimum values by more than a factor of 5. The
spectral distribution (integrated over each spectral band) shall match that of
a star in the spectral class range G0 to K0 weighted by the zenith atmospheric
transmittance and the WHT transmission to the Nasmyth focus.
Table
2. Point Source Spectral Characteristics
Spectral Band (µm) |
Radiant Intensity (W ster-1) |
0.5 to 1.0 |
1 |
1.0 to 1.5 |
4.0 |
1.5 to 2.0 |
9.0 |
2.0 to 2.5 |
2.5 |
Filter
holders are required to hold up to three spectral and three neutral density
filters (TBD) to simulate different stellar types and magnitudes. These filters
will be used with all broad band sources in the calibration unit. The
optical-chassis supplier may advise the project on the choice of these filters.
Procurement of the filters is subject to project approval. The decision to
change the filters either manually or remotely will be based on a review of the
operational scenarios to be undertaken by the project; the optical-chassis
supplier is expected to participate in this review. Note that there should be no focus shift when changing from
visible to IR operation. A larger source which appears diffraction limited at K
band shall be located 2 to 3 arcseconds away from the on-axis point source;
this source is intended for use with the IR science instrumentation. The IR
irradiance at the source shall be the same as for the on-axis source.There
shall also be provision to replace the on-axis point source with a larger
source to simulate the time-averaged size of turbulence-degraded spots for
calibration of the WFS under strong turbulence conditions. A nominal diameter
of 1 arcsecond in object space is considered acceptable for this purpose.
Provision shall be made for an upgrade to aAn extended broad-band source is required for flat-fielding IR and optical
science instrumentation. This source may be a modified version of the point
source if desired, e.g. an integrating sphere with different exit apertures
that may be changed manually. The relative spectral distribution specifications are the same as for the point source.
The specified minimum radiance is given in Table 3; these values shall not be
exceeded by more than a factor of 5. The illuminated area at the Nasmyth focus
shall be at least nominally105 mm diameter (460 arcsecond )with a uniformity < 0.5%. The
project shall be notified if the size of this area presents serious design
difficulties. The use of this source will be infrequent, i.e. for the initial
checkout of some science instruments and as an auxiliary source for WFS
calibration.
Table
3. Uniform Source Spectral Characteristics
Spectral Band (µm) |
Radiance (W ster-1 cm-2) |
0.5 to 1.0 |
1.6 x 10-3 |
1.0 to 1.5 |
5.8 x 10-4 |
1.5 to 2.0 |
1.6 x 10-4 |
2.0 to 2.5 |
1.9 x 10-4 |
In addition to the broad-band sources there shall also
be an on-axis He-Ne laser to be used for the initial system alignment. The
laser beam may be inserted manually. The laser should provide a monochromatic
(0.633 µm wavelength) point source at the Nasmyth focus with an f/11 output
cone. Its brightness shall be such that the laser beam is clearly visible on a
white card anywhere within the optical train with the GHRIL room lights turned
off. If easily implemented, e.g. by manual removal of a component, a pencil
laser beam should also be provided.
It is desirable that the calibration unit should
provide as an upgrade a wavelength calibration capability for an IR
spectrometer with a slit length of at least 10 arcseconds. An indication of a
plug-in concept shall be given. The project should be informed if this is not
feasible. The effort should not be allowed to be a cost driver.
Further specifications relating to calibration
operations at the Nasmyth focus are given in Sections 6.2.4 to 6.2.6 below.
The optical system associated with the on-axis point
source specified shall have a location conjugate to the WHT exit pupil which has a diameter of 1.17 m at a
distance of 12.84 m from the Nasmyth focus. As a design
goal, a slot shall be provided for the manual insertion of a mask
simulating the WHT pupil at this location. As a minimum
requirement a simple mask may be used only on axis and in this mode
it need not be located at a pupil image. The mask must simulate the central
obscuration of the WHT. The choice
of a mask location other than at a pupil image is subject to project approval.
Analysis shall be performed to determine the required uniformity of the pupil
illumination.
Space shall be left for a camera to view the Nasmyth
focus, preferably using the same optic that inserts the light from the
calibration source. The OMC design shall include the design of a mount for this camera and take into account the
cabling requirements. A Cohu Model
6400 camera is the DALSA
area-scan camera or an EEV Super Photon
camera are preferred candidates (see http:/www.cohu.com/cctv/4800.htm);
if sufficient funds are not available an inexpensive video camera may be used.
The selected camera will be project furnished with the choice subject to
project approval.
Provision shall be made to map the AO optical-system
distortion and wavefront aberration over the full field of view. The former
information is required for astrometry purposes. To perform these operations
the preferred implementation is a mask with an array of point sources, i.e.illuminated
pinholes, which can be manually inserted at the Nasmyth focus.(The project
anticipates that these operations will be infrequent and therefore manual
insertion is acceptable.) The radiant intensity of each point source shall be
as specified in Table 2. The optical chassis supplier shall determine the
optimum illumination scheme and the size(s) of the pinholes. The number of
calibration points within the field should be determined as part of the optical
design process but it should not be less than 7 across the field.The position
of each point source relative to the central point source shall be known to an
accuracy better than ±2 µm ( 0.01 arcsecond in object space). The
repeatability of the mask position using manual insertion shall be better than ± 25 µm in the x and y axes. The z-axis (focus) repeatability shall be
better than ± 50 µm. An additional source, which is diffraction
limited at K band over the full aperture, shall be located 2 to 3 arcsecond
from the axis for use with the IR science instrumentation.
The on-axis point source design shall include a technique for
introducing a known amounts
of low-order aberration, e.g. coma, astigmatism. Sufficient aberration shall be
introduced to fully exercise the DM and WFS. The aberration generator may be
inserted manually. If necessary, the aberration generator may be positioned in
the collimated beam before the deformable mirror. A suggested approach is to
use pairs of lenses with zero overall power that can be tilted to introduce
aberration. The aberration could be calibrated using an interferometer. The
technique should be clearly defined and
costed prior to submission for the project for evaluation. Implementation of
the approach will be subject to project approval and the availability of funds.
Provision shall be made for the future installation of anto simulate atmospheric- turbulence simulator during
laboratory testing. The turbulence simulator should be based on an inexpensive
design used by Durham University. The simulator would be manually inserted just
beyond the Nasmyth focus, possibly in place of the He-Ne laser although the
optimum location should be determined as part of the design process. Further
information may be obtained from Dr. Richard Myers at Durham University.
This source is the responsibility of the WFS supplier
and the following paragraph is provided primarily for information and
space-allocation purposes.
Provision shall be made to inject a reference plane
wavefront from a light source for the
WFS phase-gradient calibration. The wavefront shall be produced by inserting
the light from the source at a point close to the AO-corrected f/16.8 focus but
before the WFS collimating lens. Light from this source will pass through the
WFS collimating lens to produce a plane wavefront. The tilt of this plane
wavefront shall be remotely and independently variable in the x and y axes over
the maximum operational phase gradient range of the wavefront sensor. This
function may be provided by the WFS pick-off stage. Further information on the
WFS calibration is provided in the Baseline Wavefront Sensor WPD
(AOW/SUB/RAH/6.65/031/97).
Provision shall be made for the calibration of
non-common path errors between the science path and the WFS path. The optical chassis supplier is expected to
devise an approach which will be subject to approval by the project. It is
expected that the wavefront error will need to be measured at several points
across the field to generate a catalogue of look-up tables for use in the
wavefront reconstruction. The number of points selected will depend on the
magnitude and rate of change of the non-common path aberrations over the field.
This section covers support and interface requirements not addressed
above.
The document AOW/SYS/RMM/6.0/01/97/NAOMI Electronics and software
interfaces is a preliminary guide to the system interface requirements.
Documentation shall be supplied in accordance with Clause 14.
Where appropriate, the same type of electronic components should be
used as are already in use at the ING. Where other components are used a
minimum of one spare for each type shall be supplied in accordance with Clause
19.
As required by Clause 20, NAOMI software shall be written to standards
agreed with the ING. A draft software standards document has been prepared by
Paul Rees. See the latest version for guidance.
In accordance with Clause 11, any NAOMI interface to the telescope or
any instrument control system shall be via DRAMA and shall conform to ING
networking standards.
Any limitations on cable lengths that may severely restrict the
location of components on or around the GHRIL table should be reported to the
project.
Figures 4 and 5 show the system
error budgets for Clauses 1 and 2 respectively. For
consistency all errors have been expressed as phase variances in radian2 at a wavelength of 2.2
µm. In parts of some work packages the errors have been converted to units that
are more appropriate and easier to interpret. The error budgets are similar to
those shown and discussed in earlier documents except that the ELECTRA DM’s
smaller fitting error and the effect of the larger subaperture size (57 x 57 cm2)
have been taken into account.
Figure 4. Clause 1 error
budget.
Figure 4 shows the Clause 1 error budget. With the change from a
continuous facesheet DM to the segmented ELECTRA DM, fitting error is no longer
the dominant effect (see Section 2.1.4 above). Because the light level is high,
i.e. magnitude 8 star, the wavefront sensor errors are small. The budget
assumes that the wavefront sensor CCD has been calibrated to specification and
the pixel size errors do not exceed 1 µm rms. A conventional centroiding
algorithm was used in determining the
budget for the CCD errors. The tip/tilt
jitter includes an allowance of 30 nrad
(0.006 arcsec) rms for jitter on the optical bench induced by telescope motion
and moving bench components; this jitter is in addition to the 70-nrad (0.015
arcsec) rms residual jitter from the WFS-FSM subsystem. The “misregistration”
box refers to errors associated with the incorrect mapping of the mirror
actuators at the wavefront-sensor lenslet array, e.g. due to a non-zero
incident angle at the deformable mirror. The optical design is such that the
deformable mirror is imaged at the lenslet array. The allowance for the
uncorrected wavefront error includes only those errors specified for the AO
system. The contribution from the WHT optics was not known at the time of
writing but this information is being sought.
The error budget in Figure 4 gives a Strehl ratio of 0.756
which is comfortably above the specified value of 0.65 for Clause 1.
The ability to satisfy Clause 2 requires that the system operate with
faint stars, e.g. visual magnitude of at least 15 or 16. The error budget shown
in Figure 5 is for an
Figure 5. Clause 2
error budget.
on-axis visual magnitude 16 guide star; operation with a
dichroic beamsplitter that allows the WFS to be used over its maximum spectral
bandwidth was assumed. Section 5.4.2 of the NAOMI technical description
document (AOW/GEN/AJL/7.0/07/96) presents the expected number of detected
photons for various spectral classes of 16th magnitude stars; several classes
exceed the error-budget number. An integration time close to the assumed
atmospheric time constant was used. In accordance with Clause 2, the time
constant assumed atmospheric conditions equivalent to a single turbulent layer
moving at 10 m/sec at 3 km above the telescope. The error budget assumed that
two benefits of the long integration time were a slower CCD readout rate and
reduced readout noise. Specifications on readout rates and noise are covered in
Section 3.0 of the Baseline Wavefront Sensor WPD (AOW/SUB/RAH/6.60/037/976).
The Clause 2 error budget takes into account the increase in sources of error
such as photon noise expected at these low light levels. Note that
this version of the error budget takes into account a small increase in readout noise predicted by the WFS WP
supplier.
Note that several simplifying assumptions were made in deriving the
error budgets and there are some small sources of error that have been omitted.
However, preliminary propagation code results appear to support the overall
performance predictions of the error-budget analyses.
The work package will be subject to Preliminary Design and Critical
Design Reviews. The document AOW/MAN/AJL/8.0/07/96 CoDR, PDR and CDR
Definitions gives some guidelines as to what levels of design, modelling and
costing are expected at each of these stages. It also gives guidelines on the
preparation of procedures, e.g. for alignment and calibration, and the level of
detail required.
Further PDR and CDR information is given in AOW/OCH/AJL/1.1/01/97
/Optical Chassis PDR Requirements and AOW/OCH/AJL/2.0/01/97/Optical Chassis CDR
Requirements respectively. In addition to the PDR and CDR, the optical chassis
supplier will also be expected to participate
in the System Design Reviews. These are also covered in the document
AOW/MAN/AJL/8.0/07/96. The first System Design Review is addressed in AOW/SYS/AJL/6.0/01/97/1st
Design Review Requirements.
In addition to the optical chassis and all associated
hardware, other deliverables include software and licenses, review documents,
test procedures and reports, reports on analyses and simulations, user manuals,
and test equipment paid for by the programme. Also see Section 25 of the NAOMI
technical description document (AOW/GEN/AJL/7.0/07/96) for further information.
The final delivery location is the WHT, La Palma. Intermediate delivery
to the location for system integration (University of Durham) is also required.