MORE EVIDENCE FOR AN ACCELERATING UNIVERSE
For Immediate Release
Contact: Science News
202/872-5119
Two teams of astronomers say their observations of distant supernova
support the bizarre notion that the universe will not only expand
forever but will do so at an ever increasing rate. Details appear in
the Oct. 31 issue of Science News, a weekly news magazine. The article
is attached.
Saul Perlmutter of the Lawrence Berkeley (Calif.) National Laboratory
and Alex V. Filippenko of the University of California, Berkeley
announced the findings on Oct. 29 at a workshop on supernovas at the
University of Chicagol's Enrico Fermi Institute. The workshop continues
through Saturday, Oct. 31, and both Perlmutter and Filippenko can be
reached through the Institute at 773/834-2057.
Please credit Science News in stories including this information.
Studies Support an Accelerating Universe
by Ron Cowen
New findings support the bizarre notion that the universe will not
only expand forever but will do so at an ever increasing rate. Early
this year, two teams studying the brightness of a collection of
distant, exploded stars--called type Ia supernovas--reported
preliminary evidence that the expansion of the cosmos is accelerating
(SN: 3/21/98, p. 185).
Although his team has only begun analysing a dozen or so new
supernovas, "the additional data set is reinforcing our conclusion
that the acceleration [of the universe] appears to be nonzero," says
Alex V. Filippenko of the University of California, Berkeley.
Filippenko and his colleagues had initially studied 16 other
supernovas.
"We have found no systematic errors that could explain why it is that
it looks like we have an accelerating universe," notes Saul Perlmutter of
the Lawrence Berkeley (Calif.) National Laboratory, a member of the
second team, which has analyzed 42 supernovas. Both Filippenko and
Perlmutter reported their latest results on Oct. 29 at a meeting at
the University of Chicago on type Ia supernovas.
Type Ia supernovas can illuminate the universe's expansion rate
because they all have roughly the same luminosity. The astronomers
record each supernovas brightness and redshift, the amount by which
cosmic expansion has stretched the wavelength of the light it emits.
Redshift also indicates how many billions of years ago the light now
reaching Earth left a supernova. The most distant supernovas studied
by the astronomers come from a time when the universe was half its
current age.
If the universe has revved up its rate of expansion, a supernova at a
given redshift would lie farther away than expected, and so it would
appear dimmer. That's exactly what both teams continue to find. The
supernovas examined are about 15 percent fainter than astronomers can
account for in a standard model of the universe with no acceleration.
Because gravity always acts to slow expansion, the findings are
forcing theorists to grapple with the existence of an antigravity
force or some other exotic source of energy in the cosmos (SN:
2/28/98, p. 139) .
Caveats about the findings abound. Astronomers worry that masking by
dust, rather than an accelerating cosmos, may explain the supernova
results. Another concern is that supernovas in the distant past may
not have been as bright as they are now. Perlmutter reports that his
team did an additional analysis in which they discarded the reddest
supernovas. Red coloration can be a signpost of fine dust, which
absorbs more blue light than red. The scientists still found evidence
of an accelerating universe.
Surprisingly, because dust seems to be ubiquitous, Filippenko's group
finds that some of the distant supernovas in their survey are less red
than those nearby. This doesn't rule out the possibility that large
particles of dust, which absorb all wavelengths of light uniformly,
cause some of the dimming, critics say.
"I'm reaching the point that I'm beginning to believe the two teams,"
says Jeremiah P. Ostriker of Princeton University. "In another year,
we will know much more, but they've come a long way in the last year."